Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison. By Matthias Gockel

Karl Barth's vituperative criticisms of Friedrich Schleiermacher are no secret, and much has been made by theologians of the apparent division between the two. In this revision of his 2002 doctoral dissertation, completed at Princeton under Bruce McCormack, Matthias Gockel joins Robert Sherman...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goroncy, Jason A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2008
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2008, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 415-419
Review of:Barth and Schleiermacher on the doctrine of election (Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2006) (Goroncy, Jason A.)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783723203
003 DE-627
005 20211229223229.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2008 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/flm190  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783723203 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783723203 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Goroncy, Jason A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Goroncy, Jason A.  |a Goroncy, Jason 
245 1 0 |a Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison. By Matthias Gockel 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Karl Barth's vituperative criticisms of Friedrich Schleiermacher are no secret, and much has been made by theologians of the apparent division between the two. In this revision of his 2002 doctoral dissertation, completed at Princeton under Bruce McCormack, Matthias Gockel joins Robert Sherman and others in enriching our understanding of the relationship between Barth and Schleiermacher, challenging traditional evaluations that ‘liberal theology’ and ‘dialectical theology’ stand in irreconcilable opposition., Gockel restricts his inquiry to an incisive and cogent comparison of the development of the doctrine of election in the two thinkers. Gockel's thesis is that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a close resemblance to Schleiermacher's own theocentric position. 
601 |a doctrina 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 59(2008), 1, Seite 415-419  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2008  |g number:1  |g pages:415-419 
787 0 8 |i Rezension von  |a Gockel, Matthias, 1969 -   |t Barth and Schleiermacher on the doctrine of election  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2006  |h VIII, 229 S.  |w (DE-627)516413929  |w (DE-576)258024348  |z 0199203229  |z 9780199203222 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23972573  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flm190  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/59/1/415/1638989  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 59  |j 2008  |e 1  |h 415-419 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027411684 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783723203 
LOK |0 005 20211229043451 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#366F93BBBD333387D3611C0959373BD7164E5A75 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23972573 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw