The Edited Bible. The Curious History of the ‘Editor’ in Biblical Criticism. By John Van Seters
It is generally accepted, says Van Seters, that the Bible as we know it today is the product of many editors or redactors. The central argument of his book is that this assumption depends on an anachronistic understanding of what editors or redactors do. To make his case, Van Seters traces the histo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2007
|
In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2007, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 557-559 |
Review of: | The edited Bible (Winona Lake, Ind. : Eisenbrauns, 2006) (Morgan, Teresa)
|
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1783721049 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211229223221.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211229s2007 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jts/flm030 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1783721049 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1783721049 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Morgan, Teresa |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Edited Bible. The Curious History of the ‘Editor’ in Biblical Criticism. By John Van Seters |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a It is generally accepted, says Van Seters, that the Bible as we know it today is the product of many editors or redactors. The central argument of his book is that this assumption depends on an anachronistic understanding of what editors or redactors do. To make his case, Van Seters traces the history of editing from antiquity to the present day, in the historically related but recently divergent disciplines of classical and biblical scholarship., On the classical side, the history of Homeric scholarship makes an obvious focus for investigation. The earliest evidence of anything we can call editorial activity comes from the Alexandrian Museum. Alexandrian grammarians aimed to establish a ‘best text’ of Homer. | ||
601 | |a Historie | ||
655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of theological studies |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899 |g 58(2007), 2, Seite 557-559 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341339555 |w (DE-600)2066662-7 |w (DE-576)098474553 |x 1477-4607 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:557-559 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Rezension von |a Van Seters, John, 1935 - |t The edited Bible |d Winona Lake, Ind. : Eisenbrauns, 2006 |h XVI, 428 S. |w (DE-627)507795792 |w (DE-576)272835668 |z 9781575061122 |z 9781575061122 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971153 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flm030 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/58/2/557/1671693 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4027409523 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1783721049 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211229043442 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#B806C402ADBB1F2A28D269AAC4DAADEB07D0F33D | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971153 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |