Can God Be Perceived?: A Phenomenological Critique of the Perceptual Model of Mystical Experience

In the perceptual model of mystical experience, the mystics are said to "perceive" God much like ordinary people perceive physical objects. The model has been used to defend the epistemic value of mysticism, and it has been championed most vigorously by William Alston in his work Perceivin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: So, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands 2021
In: Sophia
Year: 2021, Volume: 60, Issue: 4, Pages: 1009-1025
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1782511733
003 DE-627
005 20211217134903.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211217s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-020-00810-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1782511733 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1782511733 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a So, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can God Be Perceived?  |b A Phenomenological Critique of the Perceptual Model of Mystical Experience 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the perceptual model of mystical experience, the mystics are said to "perceive" God much like ordinary people perceive physical objects. The model has been used to defend the epistemic value of mysticism, and it has been championed most vigorously by William Alston in his work Perceiving God. This paper is a critique of the model from a phenomenological perspective. Utilizing insights from Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, I show that models like Alston's are based on an inadequate notion of perception, which fails to distinguish perception from other modes of intentionality; the result is that even if we assume the mystics have directly experienced God, it is not clear why we should say they have "perceived" God. Then, using a better and richer concept of perception, I show that the mystical experiences under discussion cannot be truly perceptual, because they lack some salient features of perception. The conclusion is that talks of "perceiving God" can only be analogical or metaphorical, but not literal. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 60(2021), 4, Seite 1009-1025  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:1009-1025 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00810-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4021591435 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1782511733 
LOK |0 005 20211217134903 
LOK |0 008 211217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw