Schelling as a Thinker of Immanence: contra Heidegger and Jaspers
Among the different interpretations of the philosophy of Schelling, there is no doubt that the ones developed by Martin Heidegger and Karl Jaspers played a prominent role within the most recent Schelling scholarship. Both Heidegger and Jaspers focused on Schelling's discourse on freedom, pointi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2021, Volume: 60, Issue: 4, Pages: 869-887 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1782503641 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211217125002.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211217s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-020-00784-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1782503641 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1782503641 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fulvi, Daniele |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Schelling as a Thinker of Immanence |b contra Heidegger and Jaspers |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Among the different interpretations of the philosophy of Schelling, there is no doubt that the ones developed by Martin Heidegger and Karl Jaspers played a prominent role within the most recent Schelling scholarship. Both Heidegger and Jaspers focused on Schelling's discourse on freedom, pointing out the fundamental incompatibility of its key elements, i.e. "ground" and "existence", as well as the fallacious conception of Seynsfuge that emerges from it. Moreover, Heidegger argues that Schelling's ontology ultimately falls back into traditional metaphysical subjectivism, ignoring the question of Being as such and in fact paving the way to nihilism. Similarly, Jaspers criticizes Schelling's arbitrary account of the relation between freedom and existential being and his misleading conception of transcendence. However, I argue against Jaspers that Schelling's discourse on freedom must be read as a philosophy of immanence, which aims at maintaining the concreteness of the concepts and at avoiding any form of transcendence. Consequently, I also argue against Heidegger that not only does Schelling's discourse successfully show the compatibility of ground and existence, but that Schelling's understanding of the "subject" does not comply with Heidegger's notion of "metaphysical subjectivism" and is immune to Heidegger's criticism. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 60(2021), 4, Seite 869-887 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:869-887 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00784-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4021574255 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1782503641 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211217125002 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||