Conscientious objections, the nature of medicine, and the need for reformability

The debate over whether the medical profession should accommodate its members' conscientious objections (COs) has raged on in the bioethics literature and on legislative floors for decades. Unfortunately, participants on all sides of the debate fail to distinguish among different types of CO, a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Kim, Eric J. (Author) ; Ferguson, Kyle (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2022
In: Bioethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 36, Issue: 1, Pages: 63-70
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B institutional reform
B conscientious objections
B nature of medicine
B Professionalism
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1782404996
003 DE-627
005 20220119153916.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211217s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12943  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1782404996 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1782404996 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kim, Eric J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Conscientious objections, the nature of medicine, and the need for reformability 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The debate over whether the medical profession should accommodate its members' conscientious objections (COs) has raged on in the bioethics literature and on legislative floors for decades. Unfortunately, participants on all sides of the debate fail to distinguish among different types of CO, a failure that obstructs the view of which cases warrant accommodation and why. In this paper, we identify one type of CO that warrants consideration for accommodation, called Nature of Medicine COs (NoMCOs). NoMCOs involve the refusal of physicians to perform actions they reasonably judge to be contrary to the nature of medicine and their professional obligations. We argue that accommodating NoMCOs can be justified based on the profession's need to preserve reformability. Importantly, this previously underdeveloped position evades some of the concerns commonly raised by opponents of CO accommodations. 
650 4 |a Professionalism 
650 4 |a nature of medicine 
650 4 |a institutional reform 
650 4 |a conscientious objections 
652 |a NCH 
700 1 |a Ferguson, Kyle  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 36(2022), 1, Seite 63-70  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:63-70 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/KIMCOT-17.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12943  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12943  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4021397736 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1782404996 
LOK |0 005 20220119153916 
LOK |0 008 211217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-16#040951F3E98F65610670261934BF190C82C902DE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw