Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today's Debate on Divine Action

Various authors within the contemporary debate on divine action in nature and contemporary science argue both for and against a Thomistic account of divine action through the notions of primary and secondary causes. In this paper I argue that those who support a Thomistic account of divine action of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silva, Ignacio Alberto 1978- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2013
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2013, Volume: 54, Issue: 4, Pages: 658-667
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781965137
003 DE-627
005 20211211231602.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00692.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781965137 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781965137 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042550190  |0 (DE-627)769104045  |0 (DE-576)394027175  |4 aut  |a Silva, Ignacio Alberto  |d 1978- 
109 |a Silva, Ignacio Alberto 1978-  |a Silva, Ignacio 1978-  |a Silva, Ignacio A. 1978- 
245 1 0 |a Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today's Debate on Divine Action 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Various authors within the contemporary debate on divine action in nature and contemporary science argue both for and against a Thomistic account of divine action through the notions of primary and secondary causes. In this paper I argue that those who support a Thomistic account of divine action often fail to explain Aquinas' doctrine in full, while those who argue against it base their objections on an incomplete knowledge of this doctrine, or identify it with Austin Farrer's doctrine of double agency – again failing to do Aquinas justice. I analyse these objections, indicating how they do not address Aquinas' doctrine by offering a brief but full account of the latter. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 54(2013), 4, Seite 658-667  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:54  |g year:2013  |g number:4  |g pages:658-667 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1633309754  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00692.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00692.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019098115 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781965137 
LOK |0 005 20211211043429 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#529A3BCA30368050A129636E2779779DCDDFD940 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw