Expanding in a Different Direction: Reclaiming the Twofold Nature of the Moral Object
This paper argues that the impasse in Catholic moral theology around the role of the object in determining the moral species of the act was rooted in shared misunderstandings of Thomas Aquinas's analysis of human action. The paper describes Thomas's account of moral action centering upon h...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2012
|
| In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2012, Volume: 53, Issue: 4, Pages: 585-593 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781961581 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211231547.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00722.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781961581 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781961581 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1075816467 |0 (DE-627)833959352 |0 (DE-576)421133414 |4 aut |a Dillon, Dana L. |d 1970- | |
| 109 | |a Dillon, Dana L. 1970- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Expanding in a Different Direction: Reclaiming the Twofold Nature of the Moral Object |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper argues that the impasse in Catholic moral theology around the role of the object in determining the moral species of the act was rooted in shared misunderstandings of Thomas Aquinas's analysis of human action. The paper describes Thomas's account of moral action centering upon his claim in ST I-II.18.6 that the object is twofold. This distinction was often missed on both sides of the proportionalist debates. The paper argues that understanding the moral object as twofold upholds the essential elements of both sides of the proportionalist debates, holding them in their rightful balance. Moreover such an understanding offers an essential framework for Catholic theologians attending to the essential connection between acts and agents in accounts of morality. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 53(2012), 4, Seite 585-593 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2012 |g number:4 |g pages:585-593 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646684311 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00722.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00722.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 53 |j 2012 |e 4 |h 585-593 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 401909456X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781961581 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211043410 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#6E685A45FC2B7E2EBE68933522EE004AC704C476 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||