MORAL OBJECTIVITY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ETHICS: A SOCRATIC RESPONSE TO HUME'S LEGACY IN THE 20TH CENTURY

Current debate in metaethics includes the question of objectivity. What does it mean for a moral prescription to be objective? It is easy to see how matters of fact are objective, and it is also easy to see how matters of taste are subjective. But what about matters of morality? Given the diversity...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Owen (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2010
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2010, Volume: 51, Issue: 2, Pages: 178-191
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781953880
003 DE-627
005 20211211043334.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00497.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781953880 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781953880 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Anderson, Owen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a MORAL OBJECTIVITY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ETHICS: A SOCRATIC RESPONSE TO HUME'S LEGACY IN THE 20TH CENTURY 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Current debate in metaethics includes the question of objectivity. What does it mean for a moral prescription to be objective? It is easy to see how matters of fact are objective, and it is also easy to see how matters of taste are subjective. But what about matters of morality? Given the diversity in moral beliefs and practices it appears these cannot be matters of fact. Are they thus matters of taste? If so, we are left with the unlivable conclusion that all moral prescriptions are beyond rational scrutiny. David Hume expressed these problems in a way that continues to be influential today: ‘Tis as little contrary to reason to prefer even my own acknowled'd lesser good to my greater’ (Hume, 2003: 2.III.ii). Resolving problems about moral objectivity is further complicated by the philosophical presuppositions of analytic philosophy that have dominated the 20th century, initiated in the work of G.E. Moore, and promulgated in theories such as logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy. Contemporary thinkers from both the cognitivist and the non-cognitivist camps have tried to demonstrate that moral claims are objective in the sense of being subject independent. By considering contemporary appeals to the ideally rational self to establish objectivity, and objections to rationality as a ground for objectivity, it will be argued that objectivity can be grounded in the good which in turn is grounded in human nature. This approach can be found in the Socratic denial of knowingly doing evil, and out of this a foundation for moral objectivity can be developed that does not require an appeal to the individual's mental state and which preserves individual responsibility for knowing the good. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 51(2010), 2, Seite 178-191  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2010  |g number:2  |g pages:178-191 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646154762  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00497.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00497.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019086869 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781953880 
LOK |0 005 20211211043334 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#4EB08A73F808B957C0A2E49A68750E6B8D645065 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL