‘NOLI ME TANGERE’: WHY JOHN MEIER WON'T TOUCH THE RISEN LORD
John Meier distinguishes ‘the real Jesus’ from ‘the historical Jesus’. Meier claims that whatever happened to the real Jesus after his death, his resurrection cannot belong to the historical Jesus because that event is in principle not open to the observation of any observer. But why think that the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2009
|
| In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2009, Volume: 50, Issue: 1, Pages: 91-97 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781949603 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211231507.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00408.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781949603 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781949603 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)123518385 |0 (DE-627)035334142 |0 (DE-576)160636663 |4 aut |a Craig, William Lane |d 1949- | |
| 109 | |a Craig, William Lane 1949- |a Craig, William L. 1949- |a Lane Craig, William 1949- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘NOLI ME TANGERE’: WHY JOHN MEIER WON'T TOUCH THE RISEN LORD |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a John Meier distinguishes ‘the real Jesus’ from ‘the historical Jesus’. Meier claims that whatever happened to the real Jesus after his death, his resurrection cannot belong to the historical Jesus because that event is in principle not open to the observation of any observer. But why think that the resurrection is not observable in this way? Meier finds justification in Gerald O'Collins' view that although the resurrection of Jesus is a real event, it is not an event in space and time and hence should not be called historical, since a necessary condition of historical occurrences is that they are known to have happened in our space-time continuum. Is this a good argument for the resurrection's being in principle excludable from the historical Jesus? A close examination of the argument reveals that it is not and that Meier's adoption of such a procedure contradicts Meier's own historical methodology. | ||
| 601 | |a Noli me tangere | ||
| 601 | |a Meier, John P. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 50(2009), 1, Seite 91-97 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:91-97 |
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00408.x |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free article)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00408.x |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00408.x |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019082588 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781949603 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211043314 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#71A7BF44EF348689BF2CE351DF01CB0639579954 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
