GILSON AND GOUHIER: FRAMING ‘CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY’

Focusing on their approaches to Nicolas Malebranche, this article compares the contributions of Étienne Gilson and his student and colleague, Henri Gouhier, to the debate around the notion of Christian philosophy during the mid-1920s into the 1930s. Gilson agreed with Brunschvicg's characteriza...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fafara, Richard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2008
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2008, Volume: 49, Issue: 6, Pages: 995-1014
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 178194914X
003 DE-627
005 20211211043312.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00403.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)178194914X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178194914X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fafara, Richard  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a GILSON AND GOUHIER: FRAMING ‘CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY’ 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Focusing on their approaches to Nicolas Malebranche, this article compares the contributions of Étienne Gilson and his student and colleague, Henri Gouhier, to the debate around the notion of Christian philosophy during the mid-1920s into the 1930s. Gilson agreed with Brunschvicg's characterization of Nicolas Malebranche as an important representative of Christian philosophy, and both Gilson and Gouhier had a profound understanding of Malebranche's thought. Following St. Thomas that philosophy should strive to be a ‘perfect use of reason’, Gilson posited Christianity's influence as remaining exterior to philosophy itself. More sympathetic to Malebranche's Augustinian approach, Gouhier allowed for religious experience to operate at the interior of philosophy. These different approaches stemmed from fundamental differences as to how the historical method should be employed in philosophy and what it reveals. 
601 |a Philosophie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 49(2008), 6, Seite 995-1014  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2008  |g number:6  |g pages:995-1014 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00403.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00403.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 401908212X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178194914X 
LOK |0 005 20211211043312 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#6C51D975F3B09D63B96903E841FB234DC63B3C19 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw