Intercommunion

In 1964 the Second Vatican Council allowed intercommunion ‘sometimes’ as a means of grace. The directory of 1967 stated that an Anglican or Protestant must have no access to a minister of their own communion. In 1972 it was further enacted that this must be ‘for a prolonged period’. This allowed Ang...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bhaldraithe, Eoin De (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2002
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2002, Volume: 43, Issue: 1, Pages: 76-80
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781942463
003 DE-627
005 20211211043242.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1468-2265.00184  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781942463 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781942463 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bhaldraithe, Eoin De  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Intercommunion 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 1964 the Second Vatican Council allowed intercommunion ‘sometimes’ as a means of grace. The directory of 1967 stated that an Anglican or Protestant must have no access to a minister of their own communion. In 1972 it was further enacted that this must be ‘for a prolonged period’. This allowed Anglicans, for example, to get communion in France but not in England. An adequate spiritual reason was ‘a need for a deeper involvement in the mystery of the church and its unity’. In 1980 at the Synod of bishops, cardinal Willebrands asked that this condition be removed as it had little connection with the doctrine of the eucharist. The 1983 code of Canon Law omitted the words ‘for a prolonged period’. The Encyclical Ut Unum sint of 1995 omitted all reference to ‘no access’. This abolishes the condition completely leaving a new legal situation with many implications. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 43(2002), 1, Seite 76-80  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2002  |g number:1  |g pages:76-80 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00184  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2265.00184  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019075441 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781942463 
LOK |0 005 20211211043242 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#6EBB328EFA5CF349CE8B1F605870D4DDEC4EA454 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw