‘One Can Always Say No.’ Enriching the Bioethical Debate on Antisocial Behaviour, Neurobiology and Prevention: Views of Juvenile Delinquents
Genomic and neuro-scientific research into the causes and course of antisocial behaviour triggers bioethical debate. Often, these new developments are met with reservation, and possible drawbacks and negative side-effects are pointed out. This article reflects on these scientific developments and th...
| Authors: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2014
|
| Em: |
Bioethics
Ano: 2014, Volume: 28, Número: 5, Páginas: 225-234 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Neuroscience
B Parte interessada B antisocial behaviour B early prevention B Responsibility B Juvenile delinquents B Personal Identity |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781885311 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211042822.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01997.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781885311 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781885311 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Horstkötter, Dorothee |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘One Can Always Say No.’ Enriching the Bioethical Debate on Antisocial Behaviour, Neurobiology and Prevention: Views of Juvenile Delinquents |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Genomic and neuro-scientific research into the causes and course of antisocial behaviour triggers bioethical debate. Often, these new developments are met with reservation, and possible drawbacks and negative side-effects are pointed out. This article reflects on these scientific developments and the bioethical debate by means of an exploration of the perspectives of one important stakeholder group: juveniles convicted of a serious crime who stay in a juvenile justice institution. The views of juveniles are particularly interesting, as possible applications of current and future scientific findings are considered to be most effective if applied early in life. Based on their statements we come to the following provisional conclusions. Concerns about labelling and stigmatization are recognized and widely shared. Possible effects on one's identity are acknowledged too. Yet, a possible biological underpinning of one's antisocial behaviour is not considered to result in the development of a criminal identity. Nonetheless, psychopharmacological interventions are experienced as endangering one's current self. Concerns regarding the refusal of responsibility and the blaming of one's genes or brain can be put into perspective. Instead, participants emphasize the motive of own choice as underlying their criminal behaviour. Moreover, bioethical debate should pay attention to the role of parents of children at risk and the parent-child relationship in families at-risk. We argue that the short-term and long-term interests of children at risk, as well as their interests and those of society at large, may conflict. In order to deal appropriately with newly arising dilemmas, a normative framework needs to be developed. | ||
| 601 | |a Neurobiologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Personal Identity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder | |
| 650 | 4 | |a early prevention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neuroscience | |
| 650 | 4 | |a antisocial behaviour | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Juvenile delinquents | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Berghmans, Ron |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feron, Frans |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wert, Guido De |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 28(2014), 5, Seite 225-234 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2014 |g number:5 |g pages:225-234 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01997.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01997.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2014 |e 5 |h 225-234 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019008299 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781885311 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042822 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#7A4C305268EECE18682F584953B4039212226988 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder (corporate) |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Partie prenante,Stakeholder,Stakeholder |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Parte interesada |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Portatore di interessi,Portatore di interessi |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相关者 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相關者 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Parte interessada |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Стейкхолдер |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Ενδιαφερόμενο μέρος |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anspruchsgruppe,Anspruchspartner |