Justification for Conscience Exemptions in Health Care

Some bioethicists argue that conscientious objectors in health care should have to justify themselves, just as objectors in the military do. They should have to provide reasons that explain why they should be exempt from offering the services that they find offensive. There are two versions of this...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Kantymir, Lori (Author) ; McLeod, Carolyn (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2014
In: Bioethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 16-23
Further subjects:B exemptions
B referrals
B genuineness
B Conscientious Objection
B Conscience
B Abortion
B Reasonableness
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781884986
003 DE-627
005 20211211042820.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12055  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781884986 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781884986 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kantymir, Lori  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Justification for Conscience Exemptions in Health Care 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Some bioethicists argue that conscientious objectors in health care should have to justify themselves, just as objectors in the military do. They should have to provide reasons that explain why they should be exempt from offering the services that they find offensive. There are two versions of this view in the literature, each giving different standards of justification. We show these views are each either too permissive (i.e. would result in problematic exemptions based on conscience) or too restrictive (i.e. would produce problematic denials of exemption). We then develop a middle ground position that we believe better combines respect for the conscience of healthcare professionals with concern for the duties that they owe to patients. Our claim, in short, is that insofar as objectors should have to justify themselves, they should have to do it according to the standard that we defend rather than according to the standards that others have developed. 
650 4 |a referrals 
650 4 |a Abortion 
650 4 |a Reasonableness 
650 4 |a genuineness 
650 4 |a exemptions 
650 4 |a Conscience 
650 4 |a Conscientious Objection 
700 1 |a McLeod, Carolyn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 28(2014), 1, Seite 16-23  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2014  |g number:1  |g pages:16-23 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/KANJFC.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12055  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12055  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019007969 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781884986 
LOK |0 005 20211211042821 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#19CE86060AB5193C9C1771DD79F3E9CF41F59611 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw