Justification for Conscience Exemptions in Health Care
Some bioethicists argue that conscientious objectors in health care should have to justify themselves, just as objectors in the military do. They should have to provide reasons that explain why they should be exempt from offering the services that they find offensive. There are two versions of this...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2014
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 16-23 |
Further subjects: | B
exemptions
B referrals B genuineness B Conscientious Objection B Conscience B Abortion B Reasonableness |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1781884986 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211211042820.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211211s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12055 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1781884986 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781884986 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kantymir, Lori |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Justification for Conscience Exemptions in Health Care |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Some bioethicists argue that conscientious objectors in health care should have to justify themselves, just as objectors in the military do. They should have to provide reasons that explain why they should be exempt from offering the services that they find offensive. There are two versions of this view in the literature, each giving different standards of justification. We show these views are each either too permissive (i.e. would result in problematic exemptions based on conscience) or too restrictive (i.e. would produce problematic denials of exemption). We then develop a middle ground position that we believe better combines respect for the conscience of healthcare professionals with concern for the duties that they owe to patients. Our claim, in short, is that insofar as objectors should have to justify themselves, they should have to do it according to the standard that we defend rather than according to the standards that others have developed. | ||
650 | 4 | |a referrals | |
650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
650 | 4 | |a Reasonableness | |
650 | 4 | |a genuineness | |
650 | 4 | |a exemptions | |
650 | 4 | |a Conscience | |
650 | 4 | |a Conscientious Objection | |
700 | 1 | |a McLeod, Carolyn |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 28(2014), 1, Seite 16-23 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g pages:16-23 |
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/KANJFC.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12055 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12055 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4019007969 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1781884986 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211211042821 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#19CE86060AB5193C9C1771DD79F3E9CF41F59611 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |