IS PAYMENT A BENEFIT?
What I call ‘the standard view’ claims that IRBs should not regard financial payment as a benefit to subjects for the purpose of risk/benefit assessment. Although the standard view is universally accepted, there is little defense of that view in the canonical documents of research ethics or the scho...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2013
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 27, Issue: 2, Pages: 105-116 |
| Further subjects: | B
Paternalism
B benefit assessment / risk B payment B Autonomy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781884358 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211042817.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01892.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781884358 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781884358 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wertheimer, Alan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a IS PAYMENT A BENEFIT? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a What I call ‘the standard view’ claims that IRBs should not regard financial payment as a benefit to subjects for the purpose of risk/benefit assessment. Although the standard view is universally accepted, there is little defense of that view in the canonical documents of research ethics or the scholarly literature. This paper claims that insofar as IRBs should be concerned with the interests and autonomy of research subjects, they should reject the standard view and adopt ‘the incorporation view.’ The incorporation view is more consistent with the underlying soft-paternalist justification for risk-benefit assessment and demonstrates respect for the autonomy of prospective subjects. Adoption of the standard view precludes protocols that advance the interests of subjects, investigators, and society. After considering several objections to the argument, I consider several arguments for the standard view that do not appeal to the interests and autonomy of research subjects. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Paternalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a risk/benefit assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a payment | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 27(2013), 2, Seite 105-116 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2013 |g number:2 |g pages:105-116 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01892.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01892.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019007330 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781884358 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042817 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#3E533F39FA2262AB7197B87A7D7F72D8F27395E9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 11-12-21 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
