IDENTIFYING HARMS

Moral disagreements often revolve around the issue of harm to others. Identifying harms, however, is a contested enterprise. This paper provides a conceptual toolbox for identifying harms, and so possible wrongdoing, by drawing several distinctions. First, I distinguish between four modes of human v...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harrosh, Shlomit (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2012
In: Bioethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 26, Issue: 9, Pages: 493-498
Further subjects:B Harm
B genetic selection for deafness
B Moral Disagreement
B Female circumcision
B Human Vulnerability
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781884153
003 DE-627
005 20211211042816.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01889.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781884153 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781884153 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Harrosh, Shlomit  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a IDENTIFYING HARMS 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Moral disagreements often revolve around the issue of harm to others. Identifying harms, however, is a contested enterprise. This paper provides a conceptual toolbox for identifying harms, and so possible wrongdoing, by drawing several distinctions. First, I distinguish between four modes of human vulnerability, forming four ways in which one can be in a harmed state. Second, I argue for the intrinsic disvalue of harm and so distinguish the presence of harm from the fact that it is instrumental to or constitutive of a valued act, practice or way of life. Finally, I distinguish between harm and wrongdoing, arguing that while harm is a normative concept requiring justification, not all harmed states are automatically unjustified. The advantage of this view is that it refocuses the moral debate on the normative issues involved while establishing a common basis to which both sides can agree: the presence of harm to others. 
650 4 |a Moral Disagreement 
650 4 |a Human Vulnerability 
650 4 |a Harm 
650 4 |a Female circumcision 
650 4 |a genetic selection for deafness 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 26(2012), 9, Seite 493-498  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2012  |g number:9  |g pages:493-498 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01889.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01889.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 26  |j 2012  |e 9  |h 493-498 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019007136 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781884153 
LOK |0 005 20211211042816 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#742417070816FE30DBA1B144F35453762C22618B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw