EVALUATING INTERVENTIONS IN HEALTH: A RECONCILIATORY APPROACH

Health-related Quality of Life measures have recently been attacked from two directions, both of which criticize the preference-based method of evaluating health states they typically incorporate. One attack, based on work by Daniel Kahneman and others, argues that ‘experience’ is a better basis for...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wolff, Jonathan (Author) ; Edwards, Sarah (Author) ; Richmond, Sarah (Author) ; Orr, Shepley (Author) ; Rees, Geraint (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2012
In: Bioethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 26, Issue: 9, Pages: 455-463
Further subjects:B Experience
B Capability
B Preference
B Health
B Patient
B Public
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781884110
003 DE-627
005 20211211042815.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01888.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781884110 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781884110 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wolff, Jonathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a EVALUATING INTERVENTIONS IN HEALTH: A RECONCILIATORY APPROACH 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Health-related Quality of Life measures have recently been attacked from two directions, both of which criticize the preference-based method of evaluating health states they typically incorporate. One attack, based on work by Daniel Kahneman and others, argues that ‘experience’ is a better basis for evaluation. The other, inspired by Amartya Sen, argues that ‘capability’ should be the guiding concept. In addition, opinion differs as to whether health evaluation measures are best derived from consultations with the general public, with patients, or with health professionals. And there is disagreement about whether these opinions should be solicited individually and aggregated, or derived instead from a process of collective deliberation. These distinctions yield a wide variety of possible approaches, with potentially differing policy implications. We consider some areas of disagreement between some of these approaches. We show that many of the perspectives seem to capture something important, such that it may be a mistake to reject any of them. Instead we suggest that some of the existing ‘instruments’ designed to measure HR QoLs may in fact successfully already combine these attributes, and with further refinement such instruments may be able to provide a reasonable reconciliation between the perspectives. 
601 |a Intervention 
650 4 |a Experience 
650 4 |a Patient 
650 4 |a Public 
650 4 |a Capability 
650 4 |a Experience 
650 4 |a Preference 
650 4 |a Health 
700 1 |a Edwards, Sarah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Richmond, Sarah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Orr, Shepley  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rees, Geraint  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 26(2012), 9, Seite 455-463  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2012  |g number:9  |g pages:455-463 
856 |u https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1419508/2/Wolff_et_al%2C_%27Reconciliation%27_September_2010_Template.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01888.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01888.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019007098 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781884110 
LOK |0 005 20211211042815 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#051622404F52854FAA297BDF370BBF17BB3DEC08 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Patient 
STB 0 0 |a Patient 
STC 0 0 |a Paciente 
STD 0 0 |a Paziente 
STE 0 0 |a 病人 
STF 0 0 |a 病人 
STG 0 0 |a Paciente 
STH 0 0 |a Пациент 
STI 0 0 |a Ασθενής 
SYE 0 0 |a Patienten