WRONGS, PREFERENCES, AND THE SELECTION OF CHILDREN: A CRITIQUE OF REBECCA BENNETT'S ARGUMENT AGAINST THE PRINCIPLE OF PROCREATIVE BENEFICENCE
Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation – the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong – is in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2012
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 26, Issue: 8, Pages: 447-454 |
| Further subjects: | B
impersonal harm
B Bennett B Preference B Savulescu B procreative beneficence B non-person-affecting wrong B Intuition |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781884102 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211042815.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781884102 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781884102 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Herissone-Kelly, Peter |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a WRONGS, PREFERENCES, AND THE SELECTION OF CHILDREN: A CRITIQUE OF REBECCA BENNETT'S ARGUMENT AGAINST THE PRINCIPLE OF PROCREATIVE BENEFICENCE |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation – the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong – is indefensible. Therefore, there can be no obligations of the sort that the principle asserts. The positive thesis, on the other hand, attempts to plug an explanatory gap that arises once the principle has been rejected. That is, it holds that the intuitions of those who adhere to the principle are not genuine moral intuitions, but instead simply give voice to mere (non-moral) preferences. This paper, while agreeing that Savulescu's principle does not express a genuine moral obligation, takes issue with both of Bennett's theses. It is suggested that the argument for the negative thesis is either weak or question-begging, while there is insufficient reason to suppose the positive thesis true. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a non-person-affecting wrong | |
| 650 | 4 | |a impersonal harm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Preference | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intuition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Savulescu | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bennett | |
| 650 | 4 | |a procreative beneficence | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 26(2012), 8, Seite 447-454 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2012 |g number:8 |g pages:447-454 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 26 |j 2012 |e 8 |h 447-454 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 401900708X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781884102 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042815 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#1B00A19C05081BFF3931371A9917F50FA113A3DA | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Intuition |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Intuition |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Intuición |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Intuizione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 直觉,直观 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 直覺,直觀 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Intuição |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Интуиция |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διαίσθηση |