ELECTIVE TWIN REDUCTIONS: EVIDENCE AND ETHICS

Twelve years ago the British media got wind of a London gynecologist who performed an elective reduction on a twin pregnancy reducing it to a singleton. Perhaps not surprisingly, opinion on the moral status of twin reductions was divided. But in the last few years new evidence regarding the medical...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mcclimans, Leah (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2010
In: Bioethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 24, Issue: 6, Pages: 295-303
Further subjects:B Ethics
B selective reductions
B Evidence
B elective reductions
B multi-fetal reductions
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781882495
003 DE-627
005 20211211042806.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01704.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781882495 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781882495 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mcclimans, Leah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a ELECTIVE TWIN REDUCTIONS: EVIDENCE AND ETHICS 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Twelve years ago the British media got wind of a London gynecologist who performed an elective reduction on a twin pregnancy reducing it to a singleton. Perhaps not surprisingly, opinion on the moral status of twin reductions was divided. But in the last few years new evidence regarding the medical risks of twin pregnancies has emerged, suggesting that twin reductions are relevantly similar to the reductions performed on high-end multi-fetal pregnancies. This evidence has appeared to resolve the moral debate. In this paper I look at the role of clinical evidence in medical ethics. In particular I examine the role of clinical evidence in determining what counts as a significant harm or risk. First, I challenge the extent to which these empirical claims are descriptive, suggesting instead that the evidence is to some degree normative in character. Second, I question whether such empirical claims should count as evidence for what are essentially difficult ethical decisions – a role they appear to play in the case of elective reductions. I will argue that they should not, primarily because the value-laden nature of this evidence conceals much of what is ethically at stake. It is important to recognize that empirical evidence cannot be a substitute for ethical deliberation. 
650 4 |a elective reductions 
650 4 |a selective reductions 
650 4 |a multi-fetal reductions 
650 4 |a Evidence 
650 4 |a Ethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 24(2010), 6, Seite 295-303  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2010  |g number:6  |g pages:295-303 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01704.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01704.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2010  |e 6  |h 295-303 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019005478 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781882495 
LOK |0 005 20211211042806 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#ADADC50B891FC67625DB02FAAFDFE04AFA5D12B5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw