AGAINST RISK-BENEFIT REVIEW OF PRISONER RESEARCH
The 2006 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, ‘Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners’, recommended five main changes to current US Common Rule regulations on prisoner research. Their third recommendation was to shift from a category-based to a risk-benefit approach to research revie...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2010
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 14-22 |
Further subjects: | B
IOM report
B undue inducement B Prisoner B risk-benefit B Research B Coercion B Exploitation |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1781882118 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211211042803.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211211s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01775.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1781882118 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781882118 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chwang, Eric |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a AGAINST RISK-BENEFIT REVIEW OF PRISONER RESEARCH |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The 2006 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, ‘Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners’, recommended five main changes to current US Common Rule regulations on prisoner research. Their third recommendation was to shift from a category-based to a risk-benefit approach to research review, similar to current guidelines on pediatric research. However, prisoners are not children, so risk-benefit constraints on prisoner research must be justified in a different way from those on pediatric research. In this paper I argue that additional risk-benefit constraints on prisoner research are unnecessary: the current Common Rule regulations, omitting category-based restrictions but conjoined with the IOM report's other four main recommendations, ensure that prisoner research is as ethical as non-prisoner research is. I explain why four problems which which may be more prevalent in prisons and which risk-benefit constraints may seem to address – coercion, undue inducements, exploitation, and protection from harm – are in fact not solved by adding further risk-benefit constraints on prisoner research. | ||
650 | 4 | |a IOM report | |
650 | 4 | |a Exploitation | |
650 | 4 | |a undue inducement | |
650 | 4 | |a Coercion | |
650 | 4 | |a risk-benefit | |
650 | 4 | |a Prisoner | |
650 | 4 | |a Research | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 24(2010), 1, Seite 14-22 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2010 |g number:1 |g pages:14-22 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01775.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01775.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4019005095 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1781882118 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211211042803 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#2B16EF4EF881010133A34F67DB7185E0FEDD8FC2 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |