DEAF BY DESIGN: DISABILITY AND IMPARTIALITY

In ‘Benefit, Disability and the Non-Identity Problem’, Hallvard Lillehammer uses the case of a couple who chose to have deaf children to argue against the view that impartial perspectives can provide an exhaustive account of the rightness and wrongness of particular reproductive choices. His conclus...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shaw, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2008
In: Bioethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 22, Issue: 8, Pages: 407-413
Further subjects:B Disability
B Deafness
B Impartiality
B non-identity problem
B designer babies
B procreative liberty
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781881316
003 DE-627
005 20211211042759.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781881316 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781881316 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Shaw, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a DEAF BY DESIGN: DISABILITY AND IMPARTIALITY 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In ‘Benefit, Disability and the Non-Identity Problem’, Hallvard Lillehammer uses the case of a couple who chose to have deaf children to argue against the view that impartial perspectives can provide an exhaustive account of the rightness and wrongness of particular reproductive choices. His conclusion is that the traditional approach to the non-identity problem leads to erroneous conclusions about the morality of creating disabled children. This paper will show that Lillehammer underestimates the power of impartial perspectives and exaggerates the ethical force of partial perspectives, which in turn commits him to providing weak justifications for the choice made by the couple in his example case. 
650 4 |a Disability 
650 4 |a procreative liberty 
650 4 |a non-identity problem 
650 4 |a Impartiality 
650 4 |a Deafness 
650 4 |a designer babies 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 22(2008), 8, Seite 407-413  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2008  |g number:8  |g pages:407-413 
856 |u https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/17810/1/17810.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 22  |j 2008  |e 8  |h 407-413 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019004293 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781881316 
LOK |0 005 20211211042759 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#15C4221833BEE1EC98576053AE7CEE4B766BAA93 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw