A CRITIQUE OF THE INNOVATION ARGUMENT AGAINST A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM

President Bush and his Council of Economic Advisors have claimed that the US shouldn't adopt a national health program because doing so would slow innovation in health care. Some have attacked this argument by challenging its moral claim that innovativeness is a good ground for choosing between...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rajczi, Alex (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2007
In: Bioethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 21, Issue: 6, Pages: 316-323
Further subjects:B Innovation
B Council of Economic Advisors
B uninsured
B National Health Insurance
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1781880484
003 DE-627
005 20211211042755.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00559.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781880484 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781880484 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rajczi, Alex  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Rajczi, Alex 
245 1 2 |a A CRITIQUE OF THE INNOVATION ARGUMENT AGAINST A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a President Bush and his Council of Economic Advisors have claimed that the US shouldn't adopt a national health program because doing so would slow innovation in health care. Some have attacked this argument by challenging its moral claim that innovativeness is a good ground for choosing between health care systems. This reply is misguided. If we want to refute the argument from innovation, we have to undercut the premise that seems least controversial – the premise that our current system produces more innovation than a national health program would. I argue that this premise is false. The argument requires clarifying the concept ‘national health program’ and examining various theories of human well-being. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Council of Economic Advisors 
650 4 |a Innovation 
650 4 |a uninsured 
650 4 |a National Health Insurance 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 21(2007), 6, Seite 316-323  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2007  |g number:6  |g pages:316-323 
856 |u https://philarchive.org/rec/RAJACO  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00559.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00559.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019003467 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781880484 
LOK |0 005 20211211042755 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#80F9B3A3454660C65B9167034332993B23EB50D9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Innovation 
STB 0 0 |a Innovation 
STC 0 0 |a Innovación 
STD 0 0 |a Innovazione 
STE 0 0 |a 创新 
STF 0 0 |a 創新 
STG 0 0 |a Inovação 
STH 0 0 |a Инновация 
STI 0 0 |a Καινοτομία 
SYE 0 0 |a Neuerung,Innovationsverhalten,Innovationen