PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE: A NEW LOOK AT THE ARGUMENTS
In this paper, I examine the arguments against physician assisted suicide (PAS). Many of these arguments are consequentialist. Consequentialist arguments rely on empirical claims about the future and thus their strength depends on how likely it is that the predictions will be realized. I discuss the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2007
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 21, Issue: 3, Pages: 127-139 |
| Further subjects: | B
Physician Assisted Suicide
B Assisted Suicide B death with dignity B Euthanasia |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781880271 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211042754.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00536.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781880271 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781880271 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dieterle, J. M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE: A NEW LOOK AT THE ARGUMENTS |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, I examine the arguments against physician assisted suicide (PAS). Many of these arguments are consequentialist. Consequentialist arguments rely on empirical claims about the future and thus their strength depends on how likely it is that the predictions will be realized. I discuss these predictions against the backdrop of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act and the practice of PAS in the Netherlands. I then turn to a specific consequentialist argument against PAS – Susan M. Wolf's feminist critique of the practice. Finally, I examine the two most prominent deontological arguments against PAS. Ultimately, I conclude that no anti-PAS argument has merit. Although I do not provide positive arguments for PAS, if none of the arguments against it are strong, we have no reason not to legalize it. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Euthanasia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a death with dignity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Assisted Suicide | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Physician Assisted Suicide | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 21(2007), 3, Seite 127-139 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2007 |g number:3 |g pages:127-139 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00536.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00536.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019003254 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781880271 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042754 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#00C93092181E46E6C46FEB8FAEE86607B12E0A1C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||