Rationing Mental Health Care: Parity, Disparity, and Justice
Recent policy debates in the US over access to mental health care have raised several philosophically complex ethical and conceptual issues. The defeat of mental health parity legislation in the US Congress has brought new urgency and relevance to theoretical and empirical investigations into the na...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2002
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2002, Volume: 16, Issue: 5, Pages: 469-485 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1781878528 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211211042745.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211211s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1467-8519.00303 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1781878528 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781878528 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Woolfolk, Robert L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rationing Mental Health Care: Parity, Disparity, and Justice |
264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Recent policy debates in the US over access to mental health care have raised several philosophically complex ethical and conceptual issues. The defeat of mental health parity legislation in the US Congress has brought new urgency and relevance to theoretical and empirical investigations into the nature of mental illness and its relation to other forms of sickness and disability. Manifold, nebulous, and often competing conceptions of mental illness make the creation of coherent public policy exceedingly difficult. Referencing a variety of approaches to ethical reflection on health care, and drawing from the empirical literature on therapeutic efficacy and economic efficiency, we argue that differential rationing, ‘disparity,’ is unjustifiable. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Doris, John M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 16(2002), 5, Seite 469-485 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2002 |g number:5 |g pages:469-485 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00303 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8519.00303 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4019001502 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1781878528 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211211042745 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#0C9B7518A0D255D8C1EBF3B7C0A167838B85E256 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |