PRINCIPLISM AND THE ETHICAL APPRAISAL OF CLINICAL TRIALS
For nearly two decades, the process of reviewing the ethical merit of research involving human subjects has been based on the application of principles initially described in the U.S. National Commission's Belmont Report, and later articulated more fully by Beauchamp and Childress in their Prin...
| Authors: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
1995
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 1995, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 399-418 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781876150 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211211042734.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00314.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781876150 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781876150 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Meslin, Eric M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a PRINCIPLISM AND THE ETHICAL APPRAISAL OF CLINICAL TRIALS |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1995 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For nearly two decades, the process of reviewing the ethical merit of research involving human subjects has been based on the application of principles initially described in the U.S. National Commission's Belmont Report, and later articulated more fully by Beauchamp and Childress in their Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Recently, the use of ethical principles for deliberating about moral problems in medicine and research, referred to in the pejorative sense as “principlism”, has come under scrutiny. In this paper we argue that these principles can provide a foundation for the source of ethical appraisal of human research, but are not themselves wholly adequate for this purpose. Therefore, we further propose that (1) principles should be understood as heuristics that can be “specified” as described by DeGrazia (1992), and (2) that the principle-based approach should be supplemented by formally incorporating “sensitivity to context” into the evaluation of clinical trials | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Sutherland, Heather J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lavery, James V. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Till, James E. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 9(1995), 4, Seite 399-418 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:1995 |g number:4 |g pages:399-418 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00314.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00314.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4018999135 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781876150 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042734 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#6BB6D260F3AA7F537B0017342648B80C45DF8590 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||