TREATMENT LIMITATION DECISIONS UNDER UNCERTAINTY: THE VALUE OF SUBSEQUENT EUTHANASIA

This paper examines how decisions to limit treatment to critically ill patients under uncertainty can be made rationally. Expected utility theory offers one way of making rational decisions under uncertainty. One problem with using this approach is that we may not know the value of each option. One...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Savulescu, Julian (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 1994
In: Bioethics
Year: 1994, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-73
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1781875642
003 DE-627
005 20211211042731.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00241.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781875642 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781875642 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Savulescu, Julian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a TREATMENT LIMITATION DECISIONS UNDER UNCERTAINTY: THE VALUE OF SUBSEQUENT EUTHANASIA 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper examines how decisions to limit treatment to critically ill patients under uncertainty can be made rationally. Expected utility theory offers one way of making rational decisions under uncertainty. One problem with using this approach is that we may not know the value of each option. One rational course open is to treat until further information becomes available. However, treatment can limit the range of options open. With treatment, a patient may recover such that he no longer requires life-supporting treatment. However, his life may be not worth living. If active euthanasia of %on-terminal’conditions is prohibited, the option of dying will no longer be available. Taking a rational‘wait and see’course may result in being trapped within an unbearable life. On the other hand, sometimes present practice‘lets nature takes its course'. Critically ill patients are allowed to die because it is believed that their lives will be not worth living. It is likely that some patients are allowed to die when there is some objective chance of worthwhile future life. This paper argues that a policy of treating critically ill patients until the nature of future options can be better evaluated, in company with an offer of subsequent euthanasia where appropriate, allows a more rational and humane approach to treatment limitation decisions under uncertainty. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 8(1994), 1, Seite 49-73  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:1994  |g number:1  |g pages:49-73 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00241.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00241.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4018998627 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781875642 
LOK |0 005 20211211042731 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#5BC02D84D28B760A4A543E6C7C89E21AF9891EE7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw