Contemporary Naturalism, God, and the Methodological Relevance of Thomas Aquinas
This article claims that the strict methodological considerations of contemporary philosophical naturalism do not hinder serious philosophical reference to the thought of Thomas Aquinas because his methodological principles are just as rigorous. The methodology of Thomas Aquinas is not explicitly st...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
In: |
New blackfriars
Year: 2021, Volume: 102, Issue: 1100, Pages: 570-580 |
Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Methodology B Aquinas B Naturalism B God B Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1780360800 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211204043509.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/nbfr.12535 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1780360800 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780360800 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a DeLaquil, Edward |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contemporary Naturalism, God, and the Methodological Relevance of Thomas Aquinas |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article claims that the strict methodological considerations of contemporary philosophical naturalism do not hinder serious philosophical reference to the thought of Thomas Aquinas because his methodological principles are just as rigorous. The methodology of Thomas Aquinas is not explicitly stated in the Summa Theologiae. Therefore, the Summa contra Gentiles and On being and essence are referenced to clarify what Thomas seems to have thought about relationship between philosophy and theology. The work of Fiona Ellis is an example of how a contemporary philosopher can methodologically justify taking a position of qualified naturalism. Ellis calls this expansive naturalism. This methodology desires to accept a type of naturalistic philosophy. Yet, Ellis holds that expansive naturalism is able to employ theology as a resource for philosophy without falling into the trap of superstition. In order to arrive at this contemporary reflection, there is a very brief sketch of recent intellectual history concerning the relationship between philosophy and theology. | ||
601 | |a Methodologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophy | |
650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Methodology | |
650 | 4 | |a God | |
650 | 4 | |a Aquinas | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New blackfriars |d New York : Cambridge University Press, 1964 |g 102(2021), 1100, Seite 570-580 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)377274860 |w (DE-600)2132190-5 |w (DE-576)258584254 |x 1741-2005 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:102 |g year:2021 |g number:1100 |g pages:570-580 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12535 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nbfr.12535 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013871882 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1780360800 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204043509 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-03#4105DC40010E9AB0548AFAE87EE619F50B813599 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |