Contemporary Naturalism, God, and the Methodological Relevance of Thomas Aquinas

This article claims that the strict methodological considerations of contemporary philosophical naturalism do not hinder serious philosophical reference to the thought of Thomas Aquinas because his methodological principles are just as rigorous. The methodology of Thomas Aquinas is not explicitly st...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DeLaquil, Edward (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021
In: New blackfriars
Year: 2021, Volume: 102, Issue: 1100, Pages: 570-580
Further subjects:B Theology
B Methodology
B Aquinas
B Naturalism
B God
B Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1780360800
003 DE-627
005 20211204043509.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211204s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nbfr.12535  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1780360800 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1780360800 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a DeLaquil, Edward  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Contemporary Naturalism, God, and the Methodological Relevance of Thomas Aquinas 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article claims that the strict methodological considerations of contemporary philosophical naturalism do not hinder serious philosophical reference to the thought of Thomas Aquinas because his methodological principles are just as rigorous. The methodology of Thomas Aquinas is not explicitly stated in the Summa Theologiae. Therefore, the Summa contra Gentiles and On being and essence are referenced to clarify what Thomas seems to have thought about relationship between philosophy and theology. The work of Fiona Ellis is an example of how a contemporary philosopher can methodologically justify taking a position of qualified naturalism. Ellis calls this expansive naturalism. This methodology desires to accept a type of naturalistic philosophy. Yet, Ellis holds that expansive naturalism is able to employ theology as a resource for philosophy without falling into the trap of superstition. In order to arrive at this contemporary reflection, there is a very brief sketch of recent intellectual history concerning the relationship between philosophy and theology. 
601 |a Methodologie 
650 4 |a Theology 
650 4 |a Philosophy 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a Methodology 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Aquinas 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New blackfriars  |d New York : Cambridge University Press, 1964  |g 102(2021), 1100, Seite 570-580  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)377274860  |w (DE-600)2132190-5  |w (DE-576)258584254  |x 1741-2005  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:102  |g year:2021  |g number:1100  |g pages:570-580 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12535  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nbfr.12535  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4013871882 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1780360800 
LOK |0 005 20211204043509 
LOK |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-03#4105DC40010E9AB0548AFAE87EE619F50B813599 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw