Questions About the Perception of “Christian Truth”: On the Affective Effects of Sin
This article engages David Bentley Hart's critique of coercive “demonstration” in apologetics in favor of Gospel proclamation in the mode of “persuasion.” More specifically, I evaluate Hart's articulation of persuasion as a discourse that is primarily aesthetic and traffics primarily in be...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2007
|
In: |
New blackfriars
Year: 2007, Volume: 88, Issue: 1017, Pages: 585-593 |
Further subjects: | B
Beauty
B Violence B David Bentley Hart B Aesthetics B Natural Theology B Apologetics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1780348614 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211204043408.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00185.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1780348614 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780348614 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Smith, James K. A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Questions About the Perception of “Christian Truth”: On the Affective Effects of Sin |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article engages David Bentley Hart's critique of coercive “demonstration” in apologetics in favor of Gospel proclamation in the mode of “persuasion.” More specifically, I evaluate Hart's articulation of persuasion as a discourse that is primarily aesthetic and traffics primarily in beauty. After expressing an appreciation for Hart's critique of the traditional apologetics of demonstration, I suggest that Hart's own proposal still has elements of an “apologetic”—a kind of natural “aesthetic” theology, but a natural theology nonetheless. I conclude by extrapolating the Reformed critique of natural theology (based on the “noetic effects of sin”) to include a critique of Hart's aesthetic quasi-natural theology by providing an account of the “affective” effects of sin. | ||
650 | 4 | |a David Bentley Hart | |
650 | 4 | |a Beauty | |
650 | 4 | |a Violence | |
650 | 4 | |a Aesthetics | |
650 | 4 | |a Natural Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Apologetics | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New blackfriars |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1964 |g 88(2007), 1017, Seite 585-593 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)377274860 |w (DE-600)2132190-5 |w (DE-576)258584254 |x 1741-2005 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:88 |g year:2007 |g number:1017 |g pages:585-593 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251170 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00185.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00185.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 88 |j 2007 |e 1017 |h 585-593 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013859696 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1780348614 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204043408 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-03#0FAD3970168A71AB69224D560B170EACC5C3BBD3 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251170 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |