Questions About the Perception of “Christian Truth”: On the Affective Effects of Sin

This article engages David Bentley Hart's critique of coercive “demonstration” in apologetics in favor of Gospel proclamation in the mode of “persuasion.” More specifically, I evaluate Hart's articulation of persuasion as a discourse that is primarily aesthetic and traffics primarily in be...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, James K. A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2007
In: New blackfriars
Year: 2007, Volume: 88, Issue: 1017, Pages: 585-593
Further subjects:B Beauty
B Violence
B David Bentley Hart
B Aesthetics
B Natural Theology
B Apologetics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1780348614
003 DE-627
005 20211204043408.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211204s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00185.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1780348614 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1780348614 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Smith, James K. A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Questions About the Perception of “Christian Truth”: On the Affective Effects of Sin 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article engages David Bentley Hart's critique of coercive “demonstration” in apologetics in favor of Gospel proclamation in the mode of “persuasion.” More specifically, I evaluate Hart's articulation of persuasion as a discourse that is primarily aesthetic and traffics primarily in beauty. After expressing an appreciation for Hart's critique of the traditional apologetics of demonstration, I suggest that Hart's own proposal still has elements of an “apologetic”—a kind of natural “aesthetic” theology, but a natural theology nonetheless. I conclude by extrapolating the Reformed critique of natural theology (based on the “noetic effects of sin”) to include a critique of Hart's aesthetic quasi-natural theology by providing an account of the “affective” effects of sin. 
650 4 |a David Bentley Hart 
650 4 |a Beauty 
650 4 |a Violence 
650 4 |a Aesthetics 
650 4 |a Natural Theology 
650 4 |a Apologetics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New blackfriars  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1964  |g 88(2007), 1017, Seite 585-593  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)377274860  |w (DE-600)2132190-5  |w (DE-576)258584254  |x 1741-2005  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:88  |g year:2007  |g number:1017  |g pages:585-593 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251170  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00185.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00185.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 88  |j 2007  |e 1017  |h 585-593 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4013859696 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1780348614 
LOK |0 005 20211204043408 
LOK |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-03#0FAD3970168A71AB69224D560B170EACC5C3BBD3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251170 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw