Where Does The God Delusion Come from?
While Richard Dawkins' polemic against religion scores easy points against Christian fundamentalisms, he supposes his target to be much vaster: “I am not attacking any particular version of God or gods. I am attacking God, all gods”. Given The God Delusion's lack of extended argument, hist...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2007
|
In: |
New blackfriars
Year: 2007, Volume: 88, Issue: 1017, Pages: 507-521 |
Further subjects: | B
Belief
B Dawkins B Explanation B Religion B Science B God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 178034855X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211204234341.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00172.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)178034855X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178034855X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)13137396X |0 (DE-627)508492289 |0 (DE-576)165033207 |4 aut |a Lash, Nicholas |d 1934-2020 | |
109 | |a Lash, Nicholas 1934-2020 |a Lash, Nicholas Langrishe Alleyne 1934-2020 | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Where Does The God Delusion Come from? |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a While Richard Dawkins' polemic against religion scores easy points against Christian fundamentalisms, he supposes his target to be much vaster: “I am not attacking any particular version of God or gods. I am attacking God, all gods”. Given The God Delusion's lack of extended argument, historical ignorance and unfamiliarity with the literature, the praise it has received from some distinguished scientists is troubling. This essay seeks, first, to examine some of the book's chief weaknesses – its ignorance of the grammar of “God” and of “belief in God”; the crudeness of its account of how texts are best read; its lack of interest in ethics – and, second, to address the question of what it is about the climate of the times that enables so ill-informed and badly argued a tirade to be widely welcomed by many apparently well-educated people. The latter issue is addressed, first, by considering the illusion, unique to the English-speaking world, that there is some single set of procedures which uniquely qualify as “scientific” and give privileged access to truth; second, by examining historical shifts in the senses of “religion”; thirdly, by locating Dawkins' presuppositions concerning both “science” and “religion”, his paradoxical belief in progress, and the reception which the book has received, in relation to tensions in our culture signalled, fifty years ago, by C. P. Snow. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Explanation | |
650 | 4 | |a Religion | |
650 | 4 | |a Science | |
650 | 4 | |a Belief | |
650 | 4 | |a God | |
650 | 4 | |a Dawkins | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t New blackfriars |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1964 |g 88(2007), 1017, Seite 507-521 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)377274860 |w (DE-600)2132190-5 |w (DE-576)258584254 |x 1741-2005 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:88 |g year:2007 |g number:1017 |g pages:507-521 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251164 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00172.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00172.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 88 |j 2007 |e 1017 |h 507-521 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013859637 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 178034855X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204043408 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-03#32588636065CAEAABB6E1DFD9DCE68DDC606E2DF | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251164 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religions,Religion |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Religión,Religión,Religión |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Religione,Religione,Religione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Religião,Religião |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Религия,Религия (мотив) |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) |
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |