THE BITTERNESS OF CAIN: (POST)MODERN FLIGHT FROM DETERMINANCY

This essy is offered as a critique of modernity, but a critique which aims to be internal and empathetic in character. To achieve this, it proceeds by way of a modern literary text. The essy seeks to didtance itself from certain assumptions which wre commonly made by theological critiques of the mod...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lowe, Walter 1940- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 1998
In: Literature and theology
Year: 1998, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 379-389
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1780306660
003 DE-627
005 20211204234058.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211204s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/litthe/12.4.379  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1780306660 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1780306660 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)172241162  |0 (DE-627)697152901  |0 (DE-576)133110052  |4 aut  |a Lowe, Walter  |d 1940- 
109 |a Lowe, Walter 1940-  |a Lowe, Walter James 1940-  |a Lowe, Walter, J. 1940- 
245 1 0 |a THE BITTERNESS OF CAIN: (POST)MODERN FLIGHT FROM DETERMINANCY 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essy is offered as a critique of modernity, but a critique which aims to be internal and empathetic in character. To achieve this, it proceeds by way of a modern literary text. The essy seeks to didtance itself from certain assumptions which wre commonly made by theological critiques of the modern. For it seems to me that the prospects for a postmodern christian theology depend in considerable part on how such a theology depend in considerable part on how such a theology handles the concept of transendence. In a move which is perhaps unusual fora theologian, I shall decline to make ‘trancendence’ or more ‘experience of transendence’ pivotal for theology. Rather I shall treat the concept with reserve,linking it to what I shall call ‘determinacy’ and arguing that for Christian theology any concept of tanscendence is found in the determinate and remains indissociably linked, not to say bound, to it. At stake is a classic issue: the irreducibility, for Chistian theology, of the ‘scandal of particularity’.The target of my criticism is a certain anti-intellectuahsm, specifically the long-standing penchant, shared by liberal and neo-orthodox theologians alike, and now by ‘postmodernists’ as well, to allege that the human intellect is inherendy an instrument of domination. The German term ‘Begriff’, allied to ‘greiferi’ (‘to grasp’), is commonly adduced as evidence that the mind always seeks to control. Even apart from questions about what the speaker's mind is doing in advancing this position, and apart from the reliance on anti-intellectualism and a faculty psychology, there is the fact that such argument has the gnosticizing effect of conflating finitude and sin. Implicitly or explicidy die mind the mind as faculty, not aspars pro toto representative of the person is portrayed as inherendy bent toward the demonic. Litde wonder then if such theologies seek transcendence elsewhere, in expenences construed to be independent of, if not antithetical to, the mind. The essay criticizes a postmodernism such as that of Mark C. Taylor, which moves along diese lines. But it does so by making use of deconstruction and Derrida. I do not propose to make of deconstruction a new foundation for theology; neither do I acknowledge it as gatekeeper, controlling what theology can and cannot say. But I do hope to show by way of a fairly nch example that it is able to be of use The essay is of two parts. The first is entitled ‘Modernity’; the second, ‘Determinacy’, is followed by a brief conclusion. 
601 |a Determination 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Literature and theology  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1987  |g 12(1998), 4, Seite 379-389  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)34271855X  |w (DE-600)2073341-0  |w (DE-576)098474626  |x 1477-4623  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1998  |g number:4  |g pages:379-389 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23925571  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/12.4.379  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/litthe/article/12/4/379/934958  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4013817748 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1780306660 
LOK |0 005 20211204043036 
LOK |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#DF52F9A760595DEA878F97BC50DE0BB389E9BEB7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23925571 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw