Natural Law among Moral Strangers
Our goal in this paper is two-fold. First, we aim to clarify two ways in which contemporary Christian bioethicists have erred, on Engelhardt’s account, in their attempts to do bioethics within a distinctively non-Christian idiom, namely, either (1) by rejecting a principal metaethical thesis or (2)...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
In: |
Christian bioethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 283-300 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1780300603 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211204043003.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/cb/cbu021 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1780300603 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780300603 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Goss, Boaz |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Goss, Boaz | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Natural Law among Moral Strangers |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Our goal in this paper is two-fold. First, we aim to clarify two ways in which contemporary Christian bioethicists have erred, on Engelhardt’s account, in their attempts to do bioethics within a distinctively non-Christian idiom, namely, either (1) by rejecting a principal metaethical thesis or (2) by misrepresenting a principal moral-epistemological thesis of natural-law ethics, properly construed. Second, we intend to show not only that Engelhardt can and should endorse the Christian bioethicists’ use of non-Christian moral idioms in the public square but also—perhaps to the surprise both of his critics and of his supporters—that he does, in fact, do so. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Vitz, Rico |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Christian bioethics |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 |g 20(2014), 2, Seite 283-300 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320433358 |w (DE-600)2004029-5 |w (DE-576)094085587 |x 1744-4195 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2014 |g number:2 |g pages:283-300 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1642283274 |k Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbu021 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/20/2/283/2753975 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 20 |j 2014 |e 2 |h 283-300 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013811685 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1780300603 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204043003 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#ABE57F89B7186D3EAEFE779C3B5C022D14DFC731 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |