Germ-line Genetic Engineering in Light of the Theology of Marriage
This article is a response to David Jones’s “Germ-line Genetic Engineering: A Critical Look at Magisterial Catholic Teaching.” Here, Jones argues that the Magisterium’s teaching is inadequate in relation to germ-line genetic engineering (GGE) in that it neither settles the question of whether all GG...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
| In: |
Christian bioethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 156-162 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1780300034 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211204234034.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211204s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/cb/cbs013 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1780300034 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780300034 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1032303395 |0 (DE-627)738218170 |0 (DE-576)379955032 |4 aut |a Sowerbutts, Anne Marie | |
| 109 | |a Sowerbutts, Anne Marie | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Germ-line Genetic Engineering in Light of the Theology of Marriage |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is a response to David Jones’s “Germ-line Genetic Engineering: A Critical Look at Magisterial Catholic Teaching.” Here, Jones argues that the Magisterium’s teaching is inadequate in relation to germ-line genetic engineering (GGE) in that it neither settles the question of whether all GGE is illicit nor does it bring theological resources to bear on the issue. Jones himself argues against GGE, stating that it is not a therapy for a specific individual and that using the technique is incompatible with the theology of marriage because children are not accepted as gifts. I argue that there is merit in Jones’s reasoning, as GGE can certainly be used in a manner contrary to the theology of marriage. However, I am less convinced as to whether Jones actually manages to make the case that GGE, in and of itself, may not be morally permissible. I would certainly agree with his ultimate conclusion that further theological reflection is needed. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Christian bioethics |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 |g 18(2012), 2, Seite 156-162 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320433358 |w (DE-600)2004029-5 |w (DE-576)094085587 |x 1744-4195 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:156-162 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1631414224 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbs013 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/18/2/156/347953 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4013811111 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1780300034 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211204043000 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#A8F27E886015BFC4B466913E85DBC5680256B27E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||