Sex, Abortion, and Infanticide: The Gulf between the Secular and the Divine

This paper critically explores key aspects of the gulf between traditional Christian bioethics and the secular moral reflections that dominate contemporary bioethics. For example, in contrast to traditional Christian morality, the established secular bioethics judges extramarital sex acts among cons...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cherry, Mark J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2011
In: Christian bioethics
Year: 2011, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 25-46
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1780299761
003 DE-627
005 20211204042959.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211204s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/cb/cbr005  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1780299761 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1780299761 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cherry, Mark J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sex, Abortion, and Infanticide: The Gulf between the Secular and the Divine 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper critically explores key aspects of the gulf between traditional Christian bioethics and the secular moral reflections that dominate contemporary bioethics. For example, in contrast to traditional Christian morality, the established secular bioethics judges extramarital sex acts among consenting persons, whether of the same or different sexes, as at least morally permissible, affirms sexual freedom for children to develop their own sexual identity, and holds the easy availability of abortion and infanticide as central to the liberty interests of women. Secular bioethics seeks to separate children from the authority of their parents, placing children themselves as in authority to make their own judgments about appropriate lifestyle choices, including sexual behaviors. As I argue, however, absent God, there exists no standpoint outside of our own cultural sociohistorically conditioned understanding from which to communicate any deeper perspective of reality or the bioethics that such a perspective would secure. Consequently, rather than discerning moral truth, secular bioethics merely affirms its own particular cultural sociohistorically conditioned ideological perspective. It is a social and political worldview bereft of definitive moral foundation, independent moral authority, or unambiguous content. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Christian bioethics  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995  |g 17(2011), 1, Seite 25-46  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320433358  |w (DE-600)2004029-5  |w (DE-576)094085587  |x 1744-4195  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:25-46 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646458559  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbr005  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/17/1/25/268417  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4013810840 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1780299761 
LOK |0 005 20211204042959 
LOK |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#A10F0475DE8831D8BE6195D66757C8ECA63BFAAE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL