Diakonia, the State, and Ecumenical Collaboration: Theological Pitfalls

This essay questions the way in which continental Western Christians welcome political implementation (i.e., integration into the publicly funded welfare network and collaboration with heterodox Christians, members of other religions, or irreligious humanitarians) when offering their diaconic servic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hayes, Cornelia 1946- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [S.l.] Oxford University Press [2010]
In: Christian bioethics
Year: 2009, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Pages: 173-198
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 178029946X
003 DE-627
005 20220518112926.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211204s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)178029946X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178029946X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1017992134  |0 (DE-627)679815147  |0 (DE-576)354769324  |4 aut  |a Hayes, Cornelia  |d 1946- 
109 |a Hayes, Cornelia 1946-  |a Delkeskamp-Hayes, Corinna 1946- 
245 1 0 |a Diakonia, the State, and Ecumenical Collaboration: Theological Pitfalls 
264 1 |a [S.l.]  |b SSRN  |c [2010] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay questions the way in which continental Western Christians welcome political implementation (i.e., integration into the publicly funded welfare network and collaboration with heterodox Christians, members of other religions, or irreligious humanitarians) when offering their diaconic services. Among the theological assumptions underlying such reliance from outside the Church, this essay takes special issue with the idea that Christianity's “ethical” commitment to charity can be separated from its spiritual (e.g., liturgical, ascetical, missionary) concerns. Such separation suggests prioritizing charity recipients’ needs over against the framing character of charity providers’ Christian love. On the philosophical level, this same separation refashions Christian philanthropy in terms of a secularly construed “human dignity.” This dignity, even though nominally endorsed by the welfare bureaucracy, is however shown to get repudiated by the objectifying and depersonalizing implications of publicly funded social services. On the theological level, the potentially anti-Christian implications of secularly implemented “diakonia” are pointed out. The scriptural bases usually invoked for the prioritizing of needs are exposed as unfit to offer the hoped-for justification. As a result, only, and at most, a very limited, reserved, and watchful material cooperation with the secular state and with those outside the Church is recommended for Christian “diakonia.” 
601 |a Diakonia 
601 |a Theologe 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Christian bioethics  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995  |g 15(2009), 2, Seite 173-198  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320433358  |w (DE-600)2004029-5  |w (DE-576)094085587  |x 1744-4195  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2009  |g number:2  |g pages:173-198 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbp013  |m X:ELVSSRN  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/15/2/173/336732  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4013810549 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178029946X 
LOK |0 005 20211204042957 
LOK |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#84DE111A203E6A5FB72182519B5AD130D8D19F6F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw