Why Ecumenism Fails: Taking Theological Differences Seriously
Contemporary Christians are separated by foundationally disparate understandings of Christianity itself. Christians do not share one theology, much less a common understanding of the significance of sin, suffering, disease, and death. These foundational disagreements not only stand as impediments to...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2007
|
In: |
Christian bioethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 25-51 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1780298803 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230427104202.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13803600701282997 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1780298803 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780298803 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Engelhardt, H. Tristram |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why Ecumenism Fails: Taking Theological Differences Seriously |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Contemporary Christians are separated by foundationally disparate understandings of Christianity itself. Christians do not share one theology, much less a common understanding of the significance of sin, suffering, disease, and death. These foundational disagreements not only stand as impediments to an intellectually defensible ecumenism, but they also form the underpinnings of major disputes in the culture wars, particularly as these are expressed in healthcare. There is not one Christian bioethics of sin, suffering, sickness, and death. In this article, the character of the moral-theological visions separating the various Christianities and thus their bioethics is examined. Particular emphasis is placed on the differences that set contemporary Western theology at odds with the theology of the Christianity of the first millennium. As is shown, the ground for this gulf lies in the divide between traditional and post-traditional views of the appropriate role of philosophy in theology, a difference rooted in disparate understandings of the meaning of church and of the meaning of the logos, the Son of God. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Christian bioethics |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 |g 13(2007), 1, Seite 25-51 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320433358 |w (DE-600)2004029-5 |w (DE-576)094085587 |x 1744-4195 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2007 |g number:1 |g pages:25-51 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1780298811 |k Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13803600701282997 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/13/1/25/342385 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013809885 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1780298803 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204042954 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#C282CDF407A126D63A04596C7C35B022A16B9DB9 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |