Who/se We Are: Baptism as Personhood
The attempt to arrive at some consensus on precisely what qualifies a human as a person represents one of the more persistently debated and widely significant issues in modern biomedical ethics. The attribution of personhood has been and continues to be a powerful tool in moral discourse. Biomedical...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2000
|
In: |
Christian bioethics
Year: 2000, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 71-83 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
Non-electronic |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1780295561 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211204234028.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1076/1380-3603(200004)6:1;1-C;FT071 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1780295561 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780295561 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Meador, Keith G. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Meador, Keith G. |a Meador, Keith | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who/se We Are: Baptism as Personhood |
264 | 1 | |c 2000 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The attempt to arrive at some consensus on precisely what qualifies a human as a person represents one of the more persistently debated and widely significant issues in modern biomedical ethics. The attribution of personhood has been and continues to be a powerful tool in moral discourse. Biomedical and bioethical debates about personhood seem especially morally significant in late modernity given the recent trends in biomedical technology. Our attempts to formally articulate universally agreed upon criteria for personhood represent some of the last vestiges of the hope that we can achieve substantial moral agreement in an otherwise morally fragmented world. In this essay, we argue that, from the perspective of certain strands of the Christian tradition, all bioethics grounded in attempts to develop formal, objective criteria by which we may designate a given individual a person are misguided. Criteria centering on the possession of reflective mental capacity, moreover, are for Christians especially problematic. We suggest that there are no morally neutral ways of designating personhood. | ||
700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)141167092 |0 (DE-627)625408365 |0 (DE-576)181606852 |4 aut |a Shuman, Joel James |d 1958- | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Christian bioethics |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 |g 6(2000), 1, Seite 71-83 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320433358 |w (DE-600)2004029-5 |w (DE-576)094085587 |x 1744-4195 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2000 |g number:1 |g pages:71-83 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)178029557X |k Electronic | ||
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1642051470 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3603(200004)6:1;1-C;FT071 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/6/1/71/298474 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013806649 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1780295561 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204042938 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#4874FA74A6DA29A5A076A23F4F0779B8E982978C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |