Do the Bishops Have It Right On Health Care Reform?
The National Conference of Catholic Bishops has argued for significant government involvement in health care in order to assure respect for what they regard as the right to health care. Critics charge that the bishops are wrong because health care is not a right. In this article, it is argued that t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
1996
|
In: |
Christian bioethics
Year: 1996, Volume: 2, Issue: 3, Pages: 309-325 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 178029445X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211204042932.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211204s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/cb/2.3.309 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)178029445X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178029445X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sulmasy, Daniel P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do the Bishops Have It Right On Health Care Reform? |
264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The National Conference of Catholic Bishops has argued for significant government involvement in health care in order to assure respect for what they regard as the right to health care. Critics charge that the bishops are wrong because health care is not a right. In this article, it is argued that these critics are correct in their claim that health care is not a right. However, it is also argued that the premise that health care is not a right does not imply that the market is the most equitable and just system for providing health care. Natural law arguments in the tradition of Roman Catholic social teaching lead to the conclusion that a just and prosperous society has a moral obligation to provide health care even if there is no such right. Further, there are strong moral grounds for concluding that the bishops are correct in their claim that health care ought not to be considered a market commodity. It is argued that if health care ought not to be considered a commodity, then national health insurance is the best available alternative for fulfilling the social obligation to distribute health care resources justly and fairly at this time in American history. The bishops' case for government involvement can be made on the strength of the Catholic tradition in theological argumentation, independent of the claim that health care is a right. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Christian bioethics |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 |g 2(1996), 3, Seite 309-325 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320433358 |w (DE-600)2004029-5 |w (DE-576)094085587 |x 1744-4195 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:1996 |g number:3 |g pages:309-325 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1637045069 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/2.3.309 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/2/3/309/341590 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 2 |j 1996 |e 3 |h 309-325 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4013805537 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 178029445X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211204042932 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-01#392C9812999EDF66D56136B9EC3E0354442DB884 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |