Gender and Sexuality in the Garden of Eden
Various attempts have been made to argue that the plain meaning of the story of the Garden of Eden in Genesis 2-3 supports a feminist, or at least a woman-friendly, understanding of the gender and sexual relationships between Adam and Eve. I counter that these arguments are not convincing and are ha...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2006
|
| В: |
Theology & sexuality
Год: 2006, Том: 12, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 319-335 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Phyllis Bird
B Adam B Garden of Eden B Phyllis Trible B Sexuality in the Bible B feminist interpretation B Eve B patriarchy in the Bible |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Не электронный вид
|
| Итог: | Various attempts have been made to argue that the plain meaning of the story of the Garden of Eden in Genesis 2-3 supports a feminist, or at least a woman-friendly, understanding of the gender and sexual relationships between Adam and Eve. I counter that these arguments are not convincing and are hard to square with the biblical text, by considering four central elements in the story: (1) The sexual nature of ha'adam, Adam/ the earthling at the start of our story; (2) God's ‘curse’ of Eve; (3) The meaning of the woman being a ‘helper’ to Adam; and (4) Adam's naming of the woman. I conclude that the most plausible meaning of these chapters is that Adam dominates Eve sexually and otherwise from the very moment of Eve's creation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1355835806065391 |
