Will the Real Homosexual in the Bible Please Stand Up?

A public opinion survey and an examination of references to the Bible and homosexuality on the Web, show that the Bible has a considerable impact on peoples' attitudes regarding homosexuality. Interpretations of relevant biblical statements are used by conservatives and liberals to condemn or j...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wernik, Uri (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2005
In: Theology & sexuality
Year: 2005, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 47-64
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779663765
003 DE-627
005 20211127042808.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211127s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1355835805054345  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779663765 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779663765 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wernik, Uri  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Will the Real Homosexual in the Bible Please Stand Up? 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A public opinion survey and an examination of references to the Bible and homosexuality on the Web, show that the Bible has a considerable impact on peoples' attitudes regarding homosexuality. Interpretations of relevant biblical statements are used by conservatives and liberals to condemn or justify same-sex relationships. This article deals with biblical figures alleged to be homosexuals. Three pairs — David and Jonathan, Ruth and Naomi and Daniel and Ashpenaz — are mentioned most frequently as possibly being homosexuals. The arguments in favour of these claims are scrutinized and criticized. Basic flaws of disregarding the Hebrew original text, taking discrete verses out of context and lack of sensitivity to cultural differences between postmodern Western society and ancient Middle-Eastern ones were identified. It is suggested that these figures became so significant, by virtue of them being icons of homophilia—love and friendship between woman and woman, man and man, in pre-homophobia times. It is contended that those in the Bible usually identified as homosexuals are not necessarily so, and that someone who until now was never thought to be homosexual, more than anyone else in the Bible, can be more justifiably considered one. The case for seeing Ecclesiastes-Qohelet as a homosexual is presented, and thus ‘the riddle of the Sphinx’, a phrase used to describe his writings, is solved. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theology & sexuality  |d London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 1994  |g 11(2005), 3, Seite 47-64  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341908509  |w (DE-600)2070617-0  |w (DE-576)263021289  |x 1745-5170  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2005  |g number:3  |g pages:47-64 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1645928500  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1355835805054345  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 11  |j 2005  |e 3  |h 47-64 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008479279 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779663765 
LOK |0 005 20211127042808 
LOK |0 008 211127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-11-23#B47C302282790AEB179866AAB2ABF2CC8212FA37 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB