Post-secularism Marginalizes the University: A Rejoinder to Hollinger
Like David Hollinger I think that the history of secularization, or as he prefers, de-Christianization, has been unduly avoided and might well be at the center of contemporary American historiography. As he says, this ought to bring religious history more into the mainstream. But I would like to dev...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2002
|
| In: |
Church history
Year: 2002, 卷: 71, 發布: 4, Pages: 848-857 |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1779585551 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211126114518.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211126s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0009640700096323 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1779585551 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1779585551 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sommerville, C. John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Post-secularism Marginalizes the University: A Rejoinder to Hollinger |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Like David Hollinger I think that the history of secularization, or as he prefers, de-Christianization, has been unduly avoided and might well be at the center of contemporary American historiography. As he says, this ought to bring religious history more into the mainstream. But I would like to develop some of his points in a different way than he does in the recent “Perspectives” section in Church History. Our differences derive from the fact that he sees secularization as a default value, the absence of a distraction, whereas I focus on secularism, something substantial and ideological. I hope that adopting that perspective may make sense of his main puzzle, which is why religion “persists” in America even though it has lost all the recent debates. Indeed I would like to turn his question around, to suggest that secularism is failing and that we should start thinking in terms of a “post-secular” society. This could mean, contrary to Hollinger's implication, that America is not lagging in this area but might be “ahead” of Europe. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Church history |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932 |g 71(2002), 4, Seite 848-857 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)340877057 |w (DE-600)2066135-6 |w (DE-576)114617899 |x 1755-2613 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2002 |g number:4 |g pages:848-857 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/4146195 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009640700096323 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/postsecularism-marginalizes-the-university-a-rejoinder-to-hollinger/330D792F3DC3E8D6FF7626FF455ACAEB |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 71 |j 2002 |e 4 |h 848-857 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4008262768 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1779585551 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211126114518 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-28#BBBF2D9BA43D2D07F0592AF268FF12D8B7F87BE2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/4146195 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||