Thomas Rogers and the English Sabbath: The Case for a Reappraisal
From the publication of Peter Heylyn's History of the Sabbath in 1636 to the most recent studies of this doctrine, sabbatarianism has been treated as an important and controversial issue in the post-Reformation period. These studies portray sabbatarianism as a puritan innovation, which that par...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1984
|
| In: |
Church history
Year: 1984, Volume: 53, Issue: 3, Pages: 332-347 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 177957083X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211127003654.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211126s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/3166273 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)177957083X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP177957083X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)13962080X |0 (DE-627)703401351 |0 (DE-576)164826181 |4 aut |a Parker, Kenneth L. | |
| 109 | |a Parker, Kenneth L. |a Parker, Kenneth | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Thomas Rogers and the English Sabbath: The Case for a Reappraisal |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1984 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a From the publication of Peter Heylyn's History of the Sabbath in 1636 to the most recent studies of this doctrine, sabbatarianism has been treated as an important and controversial issue in the post-Reformation period. These studies portray sabbatarianism as a puritan innovation, which that party introduced in an effort to reform the church from below, having failed to covert the English church to presbyterianism. This doctrinal innovation has been described by Professor Collinson as “something more than a certain ethical and social attitude to the use of Sunday: it implies the doctrinal assertion that the fourth commandment is not an obsolete ceremonial law of the Jews but a perpetual, moral law, binding on Christians; in other words, that the Christian observance of Sunday has its basis not in ecclesiastical tradition but in the decalogue.” | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Church history |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932 |g 53(1984), 3, Seite 332-347 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)340877057 |w (DE-600)2066135-6 |w (DE-576)114617899 |x 1755-2613 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:1984 |g number:3 |g pages:332-347 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1642794147 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3166273 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3166273 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/thomas-rogers-and-the-english-sabbath-the-case-for-a-reappraisal/3A8FB9E63AE358EB8FBAFD20EACB57EA |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 400824770X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 177957083X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211126114403 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-28#FCEC26415E244397EF0AAEED8D2983F17258D66B | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3166273 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||