Christian Approval of Epicureanism
In view of the rancor and vehemence which characterize much of the patristic condemnation of Epicureanism, it seems remarkably incongruous that there should be in the Fathers any expressions of approval at all for the philosophy of the Garden. Nevertheless, such expressions do occur and with referen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1962
|
| In: |
Church history
Year: 1962, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 279-293 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1779553579 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211126114233.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211126s1962 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/3163320 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1779553579 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1779553579 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jungkuntz, Richard P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Christian Approval of Epicureanism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1962 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In view of the rancor and vehemence which characterize much of the patristic condemnation of Epicureanism, it seems remarkably incongruous that there should be in the Fathers any expressions of approval at all for the philosophy of the Garden. Nevertheless, such expressions do occur and with reference to all three divisions of Epicurus's system, canonic, physics, and ethics. No doubt the best explanation for this apparent inconsistency of attitude is suggested by Clement's definition of philosophy and the tolerance that it implies: “By philosophy I do not mean the Stoic nor the Platonic, or the Epicurean and Aristotelian, but everything that has been well said by each of the schools and that teaches righteousness along with science marked by reverence; this eclectic whole I call philosophy” (Strom., i. 7. 732CD). | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Church history |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932 |g 31(1962), 3, Seite 279-293 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)340877057 |w (DE-600)2066135-6 |w (DE-576)114617899 |x 1755-2613 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:1962 |g number:3 |g pages:279-293 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1647164893 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3163320 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3163320 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/christian-approval-of-epicureanism/2BE9803DE44199E76EB11DC0F3E0CB77 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4008230157 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1779553579 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211126114233 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-28#491459B6D7893195DAE77A3C0538B24168D57A52 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3163320 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||