The Anthropomorphic Controversy in the Time of Theophilus of Alexandria

It was the long-established custom of the Alexandrian patriarch to write each year a paschal letter to the faithful of his province. In the letter of the year 399 the Patriarch Theophilus, an ecclesiastic of great ability but few scruples, inveighed rather severely against those who taught that God...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shepherd, Massey Hamilton (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1938
In: Church history
Year: 1938, Volume: 7, Issue: 3, Pages: 263-273
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779537395
003 DE-627
005 20211126114046.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s1938 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3160566  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779537395 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779537395 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Shepherd, Massey Hamilton  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Anthropomorphic Controversy in the Time of Theophilus of Alexandria 
264 1 |c 1938 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It was the long-established custom of the Alexandrian patriarch to write each year a paschal letter to the faithful of his province. In the letter of the year 399 the Patriarch Theophilus, an ecclesiastic of great ability but few scruples, inveighed rather severely against those who taught that God was corporeal, or in other words that God had bodily form. This opinion was by no means extraordinary. For over two centuries Alexandria had been the leading center of Christian theology, and for a much longer period a pre-eminent seat of philosophic learning as well. The repudiation of anthropomorphic conceptions of God had long been a matter of common acceptance by pagan and Christian theologians alike who laid any claim to a liberal education. 
601 |a Theophilus 
601 |a Alexandria 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Church history  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932  |g 7(1938), 3, Seite 263-273  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)340877057  |w (DE-600)2066135-6  |w (DE-576)114617899  |x 1755-2613  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:1938  |g number:3  |g pages:263-273 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1647141184  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3160566  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3160566  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/anthropomorphic-controversy-in-the-time-of-theophilus-of-alexandria/722F93FFF1A2B87455762BD37FA64082  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008213511 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779537395 
LOK |0 005 20211126114046 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-28#2703EAD2C79456741946DB2AA788FA4D0A5C5821 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3160566 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw