Caregivers blinded by the care: A qualitative study of physical restraint in pediatric care

Background:The phenomenon of forceful physical restraint in pediatric care is an ethical issue because it confronts professionals with the dilemma of using force for the child’s best interest. This is a paradox. The perspective of healthcare professional working in pediatric wards needs further in-d...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Lombart, Bénédicte (Author) ; De Stefano, Carla (Author) ; Dupont, Didier (Author) ; Nadji, Leila (Author) ; Galinski, Michel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2020
In: Nursing ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 27, Issue: 1, Pages: 230-246
Further subjects:B Ethnography
B Ethics
B paediatric nursing
B physical restraint and empathic blindness
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779458738
003 DE-627
005 20211126113503.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0969733019833128  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779458738 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779458738 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lombart, Bénédicte  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Caregivers blinded by the care: A qualitative study of physical restraint in pediatric care 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Background:The phenomenon of forceful physical restraint in pediatric care is an ethical issue because it confronts professionals with the dilemma of using force for the child’s best interest. This is a paradox. The perspective of healthcare professional working in pediatric wards needs further in-depth investigations.Purpose:To explore the perspectives and behaviors of healthcare professionals toward forceful physical restraint in pediatric care.Methods:This qualitative ethnographic study used focus groups with purposeful sampling. Thirty volunteer healthcare professionals (nurses, hospital aids, physiotherapists, and health educators) were recruited in five pediatric facilities in four hospitals around Paris, France, from March to June 2013. The data were processed using NVIVO software (QSR International Ltd. 1999–2013). The data analysis followed a qualitative methodological process.Ethical Considerations:The research was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was collected systematically from participants.Findings:This study provides elements to help understand why restraint remains common despite its contradiction with the duty to protect the child and the child’s rights. All participants considered the use of forceful physical restraint to be a frequent difficulty in pediatrics. Greater interest in the child’s health was systematically used to justify the use of force, with little consideration for contradictory or ethical aspects. Raising the issue of forceful restraint always triggered discomfort, unease and an outpour of emotions among healthcare professionals. The findings have highlighted a form of hierarchy of duties that give priority to the execution of the technical procedure and legitimize the use of restraint. Professionals seemed to temporarily suspend their ability to empathize in order to apply restraint to carry out a technical procedure. This observation has allowed us to suggest the concept of “transient empathic blindness.”Conclusion:Using physical restraint during pediatric care was considered a common problem by participants. This practice must be questioned, and professionals must have access to training to find alternatives to strong restraint. Conceptualizing this phenomenon with the concept of “transient empathic blindness” could help professionals understand what happens in their minds when using forceful restraint. 
650 4 |a physical restraint and empathic blindness 
650 4 |a Ethnography 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a paediatric nursing 
700 1 |a De Stefano, Carla  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dupont, Didier  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nadji, Leila  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Galinski, Michel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 27(2020), 1, Seite 230-246  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:230-246 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019833128  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008132767 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779458738 
LOK |0 005 20211126113503 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#6AE30B02C81B08C78A3803B816D49A76741D2F2D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw