The new futility? The rhetoric and role of “suffering” in pediatric decision-making

This article argues that while the presence and influence of “futility” as a concept in medical decision-making has declined over the past decade, medicine is seeing the rise of a new concept with similar features: suffering. Like futility, suffering may appear to have a consistent meaning, but in a...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Salter, Erica K. (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2020
In: Nursing ethics
Anno: 2020, Volume: 27, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 16-27
Altre parole chiave:B Decision-making
B Futility
B Suffering
B pediatric practice
B clinical ethics
B end-of-life issues
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1779458592
003 DE-627
005 20250226033926.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0969733019840745  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779458592 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779458592 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1318482216  |0 (DE-627)188008869X  |4 aut  |a Salter, Erica K. 
109 |a Salter, Erica K.  |a Salter, Erica 
245 1 4 |a The new futility? The rhetoric and role of “suffering” in pediatric decision-making 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article argues that while the presence and influence of “futility” as a concept in medical decision-making has declined over the past decade, medicine is seeing the rise of a new concept with similar features: suffering. Like futility, suffering may appear to have a consistent meaning, but in actuality, the concept is colloquially invoked to refer to very different experiences. Like “futility,” claims of patient “suffering” have been used (perhaps sometimes consciously, but most often unconsciously) to smuggle value judgments about quality of life into decision-making. And like “futility,” it would behoove us to recognize the need for new, clearer terminology. This article will focus specifically on secondhand claims of patient suffering in pediatrics, but the conclusions could be similarly applied to medical decisions for adults being made by surrogate decision-makers. While I will argue that suffering, like futility, is not sufficient wholesale justification for making unilateral treatment decisions, I will also argue that claims of patient suffering cannot be ignored, and that they almost always deserve some kind of response. In the final section, I offer practical suggestions for how to respond to claims of patient suffering. 
650 4 |a Suffering 
650 4 |a pediatric practice 
650 4 |a Futility 
650 4 |a end-of-life issues 
650 4 |a Decision-making 
650 4 |a clinical ethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 27(2020), 1, Seite 16-27  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:16-27 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019840745  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008132627 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779458592 
LOK |0 005 20211126113503 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#8FA7F43E4D838B69D1FF2471661AB2CD63CB806C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 26-11-21  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw