Dignity from the nurses’ and older patients’ perspective: A qualitative literature review
Introduction:Dignity is one of the most important values sensitively perceived by patients in nursing care. Older patients have been identified as having a high risk of losing their dignity in institutional care. To promote optimum nursing care, a deeper insight into the problem of older patients’ d...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2019
|
In: |
Nursing ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 26, Issue: 5, Pages: 1292-1309 |
Further subjects: | B
older patients’ perspective
B Dignity B Literature Review B qualitative evidence B nurses’ perspective |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1779457561 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211126113500.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211126s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0969733017747960 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1779457561 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1779457561 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Šaňáková, Šárka |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dignity from the nurses’ and older patients’ perspective: A qualitative literature review |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Introduction:Dignity is one of the most important values sensitively perceived by patients in nursing care. Older patients have been identified as having a high risk of losing their dignity in institutional care. To promote optimum nursing care, a deeper insight into the problem of older patients’ dignity is needed.Aim:The aim was to identify, analyse and synthesise the qualitative evidence of dignity views and factors affecting it from the nurses’ and older patients’ perspective in the context of nursing care and to compare synthesised finding from the both perspective.Methods:A literature review of qualitative evidence was chosen as a study design. The ENTREQ statement was implemented to enhance transparency. The CASP – Qualitative checklist and the thematic synthesis for synthesised findings were used. The electronic databases Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE and PROQUEST were used to gather information for qualitative studies.Results:A total of 306 papers were retrieved. Fourteen qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review after methodological quality assessment using CASP. Four main themes of dignity from nurses’ perspective were synthesised: seeing the patient as a unique person, communication and privacy, involving the patient, and working culture and environment. From the patients’ perspective, six main themes were synthesised: autonomy and control, privacy, relationships, care and comfort, communication and identity. The comparison shows that the key difference is that older patients highlighted the theme relationships and nurses underlined the theme working culture and environment.Conclusion:The model structures of the older patients’ dignity from both the nurses’ and patients’ perspectives support the idea of a multidimensional structure of human dignity. The resulting model might be used in a nursing self-reflection, in the management of the institutions providing all-day care for the older people and in the education and practice. | ||
601 | |a Patient | ||
601 | |a Literatur | ||
650 | 4 | |a qualitative evidence | |
650 | 4 | |a older patients’ perspective | |
650 | 4 | |a nurses’ perspective | |
650 | 4 | |a Literature Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Dignity | |
700 | 1 | |a Čáp, Juraj |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nursing ethics |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994 |g 26(2019), 5, Seite 1292-1309 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324869460 |w (DE-600)2031461-9 |w (DE-576)273866605 |x 1477-0989 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2019 |g number:5 |g pages:1292-1309 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017747960 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4008131574 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1779457561 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211126113500 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#44BEC9D1DDC94CE2FB80CE1D1B996B4308B7DE7E | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |