How to succeed with ethics reflection groups in community healthcare? Professionals’ perceptions
Background:Healthcare personnel in the municipal healthcare systems experience many ethical challenges in their everyday work. In Norway, 243 municipalities participated in a national ethics project, aimed to increase ethical competence in municipal healthcare services. In this study, we wanted to m...
| Authors: | ; ; ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2019
|
| In: |
Nursing ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 26, Issue: 4, Pages: 1243-1255 |
| Further subjects: | B
Organizational Support
B Systematic Approach B Competence B ethics project B ethics reflection B ethics facilitators |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1779457510 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211126113459.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211126s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0969733017747957 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1779457510 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1779457510 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Karlsen, Heidi |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How to succeed with ethics reflection groups in community healthcare? Professionals’ perceptions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background:Healthcare personnel in the municipal healthcare systems experience many ethical challenges in their everyday work. In Norway, 243 municipalities participated in a national ethics project, aimed to increase ethical competence in municipal healthcare services. In this study, we wanted to map out what participants in ethics reflection groups experienced as promoters or as barriers to successful reflection.Objectives:To examine what the staff experience as promoters or as barriers to successful ethics reflection.Research design:The study has a qualitative design, where 56 participants in municipal healthcare participated in 10 different focus-group interviews.Ethical considerations:The data collection was based on the participants’ informed consent and approved by the Data Protection Official of the Norwegian Centre for Research Data.Results:The informants had different experiences from ethics reflection group. Nevertheless, we found that there were several factors that were consistently mentioned: competence, facilitator’s role, ethics reflection groups organizing, and organizational support were all experienced as promoters and as a significant effect on ethics reflection groups. The absence of such factors would constitute important barriers to successful ethics reflection.Discussion:The results are coincident with other studies, and indicate some conditions that may increase the possibility to succeed with ethics reflection groups. A systematic approach seems to be important, the systematics of the actual reflections, but also in the organization of ethics reflection group at the workplace. Community healthcare is characterized by organizational instabilities as many vacancies, high workloads, and lack of predictability. This can be a hinder for ethics reflection group.Conclusion:Both internal and external factors seem to influence the organization of ethics reflection group. The municipalities’ instabilities challenging this work, and perceived as a clear inhibitor for the development. The participants experienced that the facilitator is the most important success factor for establishing, carrying out, and to succeed with ethics reflection groups. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Approach | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Organizational Support | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethics reflection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethics project | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethics facilitators | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Competence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lillemoen, Lillian |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Magelssen, Morten |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Førde, Reidun |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pedersen, Reidar |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gjerberg, Elisabeth |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nursing ethics |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994 |g 26(2019), 4, Seite 1243-1255 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324869460 |w (DE-600)2031461-9 |w (DE-576)273866605 |x 1477-0989 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2019 |g number:4 |g pages:1243-1255 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0969733017747957 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017747957 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 26 |j 2019 |e 4 |h 1243-1255 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4008131523 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1779457510 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211126113459 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#95787A71C3F4D5D6AC66DD7280DA2B42C42B3AF5 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||