The Utility of Futility: the construction of bioethical problems

The aim of this article is to analyse the contemporary ‘futility discourse’ from a constructivist perspective. I will argue that bioethics discourse typically disregards the con text from which controversies emerge and the processes that inform and constrain such discourse. Constructivists have argu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carnevale, Franco A (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 1998
In: Nursing ethics
Year: 1998, Volume: 5, Issue: 6, Pages: 509-517
Further subjects:B Futility
B life-support
B Bioethics
B Resuscitation
B Constructivism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779437951
003 DE-627
005 20211126113338.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/096973309800500605  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779437951 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779437951 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Carnevale, Franco A  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Utility of Futility: the construction of bioethical problems 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aim of this article is to analyse the contemporary ‘futility discourse’ from a constructivist perspective. I will argue that bioethics discourse typically disregards the con text from which controversies emerge and the processes that inform and constrain such discourse. Constructivists have argued that scientific knowledge is expressive of the dominant paradigm within which a scientific community is working. I will outline an analysis of ‘medical futility’ as a construction of biomedical and bioethical communities (and their respective paradigms). I will trace the emergence and utilization of futility in the literature. My analysis of the context (i.e. the historical circumstances, the particular actors involved) within which the futility discourse emerged suggests that medical futility was constructed, in part, as a means of enhancing physician domination of a context wherein medical authority was threatened. The actors in this debate express widely divergent frameworks of ‘the good’, arguing from distinctive representations of moral agency. At times, this controversy has been argued from incommensurate moral horizons wherein the discussants debate incomparable problems. This discussion is related to a study of the ‘practice’ of futility in the clinical context. Further studies on the construction of bioethical problems are a necessary condition for supporting the truth claims of bioethical arguments. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Resuscitation 
650 4 |a life-support 
650 4 |a Futility 
650 4 |a Constructivism 
650 4 |a Bioethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 5(1998), 6, Seite 509-517  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:1998  |g number:6  |g pages:509-517 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309800500605  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 400811145X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779437951 
LOK |0 005 20211126113338 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#8F506025EEF323495B37DFDA1C03A1E3FEF911A7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw