What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review

Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of their discipline. Recent concern over reports of peer review misconduct has led some to advocate the establishment of a code of ethics for peer reviewers. Such a code should include guidelines for the dis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crigger, Nancy J (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 1998
In: Nursing ethics
Year: 1998, Volume: 5, Issue: 5, Pages: 451-458
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Epistemology
B Impartiality
B Beneficence
B editorial peer review
B Universalizability
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779437854
003 DE-627
005 20211126113337.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211126s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/096973309800500508  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779437854 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779437854 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Crigger, Nancy J  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of their discipline. Recent concern over reports of peer review misconduct has led some to advocate the establishment of a code of ethics for peer reviewers. Such a code should include guidelines for the discipline and for society at large, but it should also contain guidelines for the authors whose manuscripts are reviewed. Peer reviewers have a special obligation to show beneficence and fairness or impartiality towards the authors for whom they review. The practical application of these two ethical concepts is discussed. 
601 |a Peer Review 
650 4 |a Universalizability 
650 4 |a Impartiality 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a editorial peer review 
650 4 |a Beneficence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing ethics  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994  |g 5(1998), 5, Seite 451-458  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324869460  |w (DE-600)2031461-9  |w (DE-576)273866605  |x 1477-0989  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:1998  |g number:5  |g pages:451-458 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309800500508  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008111360 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779437854 
LOK |0 005 20211126113337 
LOK |0 008 211126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-24#025E41F6F4B529DBF592C261B257CB66EAA1F5D6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw