Mitigating Theological Disputes: Collingwood's Question and Answer

Theology is an arena of debate as much as enquiry. Theological positions are advanced and critiqued. Bold claims receive bold counter-claims. This essay considers the possibility that in many cases the debate is an illusion. Apparently contradictory theological claims truly contradict each other onl...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adams, Nicholas 1970- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2021
In: Louvain studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 44, Issue: 3, Pages: 252-276
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Collingwood, Robin G. 1889-1943 / Theology / Contradiction / Procession of Holy Spirit / Apophatic theology
IxTheo Classification:FA Theology
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NBC Doctrine of God
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1777984769
003 DE-627
005 20230904104141.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211119s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/LS.44.3.3289767  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1777984769 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1777984769 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1033582360  |0 (DE-627)741724162  |0 (DE-576)381210235  |4 aut  |a Adams, Nicholas  |d 1970- 
109 |a Adams, Nicholas 1970-  |a Ādāmz, Nīkūlās 1970- 
245 1 0 |a Mitigating Theological Disputes: Collingwood's Question and Answer 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Theology is an arena of debate as much as enquiry. Theological positions are advanced and critiqued. Bold claims receive bold counter-claims. This essay considers the possibility that in many cases the debate is an illusion. Apparently contradictory theological claims truly contradict each other only if they are answers to the same question. Apparently identical claims truly affirm the same thing only if they, too, are answers to the same question. Drawing on proposals made by the English philosopher and historian R.G. Collingwood, I suggest that the patient business of reconstructing the questions to which theological claims are answers might fruitfully be made more central to both debate and enquiry in theology. Collingwood was surprised that his philosophical colleagues thought it must be very difficult for an archaeologist to ‘read’ a Roman fort whereas they found it rather easy to read Plato’s Parmenides: he suggested that in his experience (as both an archaeologist and philosopher) that reconstructing the questions to which the Parmenides is a series of answers was much more strenuous. I consider two cases, the filioque dispute and recent writing on apophaticism, and diagnose apparent contradictions and apparently identical claims as in fact answers to different questions: they display neither contradictions nor shared affirmations respectively. I propose that taking seriously Collingwood’s proposals regarding what he calls 'the logic of question and answer' usefully slows down the exchange of bold claims and bold counter-claims. 
601 |a Theologe 
652 |a FA:KAJ:NBC 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118676636  |0 (DE-627)079459978  |0 (DE-576)160605962  |2 gnd  |a Collingwood, Robin G.  |d 1889-1943 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059758-1  |0 (DE-627)104131446  |0 (DE-576)209132159  |2 gnd  |a Theologie 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4189802-3  |0 (DE-627)105254460  |0 (DE-576)210062304  |2 gnd  |a Widerspruch 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4154344-0  |0 (DE-627)105524123  |0 (DE-576)209810483  |2 gnd  |a Filioque 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4122816-9  |0 (DE-627)105759694  |0 (DE-576)209554479  |2 gnd  |a Apophatische Theologie 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Louvain studies  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1995  |g 44(2021), 3, Seite 252-276  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)389126497  |w (DE-600)2148246-9  |w (DE-576)113144229  |x 1783-161X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:252-276 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.44.3.3289767  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3289767  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 44  |j 2021  |e 3  |h 252-276 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4003595750 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1777984769 
LOK |0 005 20230904104141 
LOK |0 008 211119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-11-18#5726E43B825DB9907E53936F0BAC1B94CF8EEABA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044020  |a FA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Apophatic theology,Contradiction,Procession of Holy Spirit,Theology,Theology 
STB 0 0 |a Contradiction,Filioque,Théologie apophatique,Théologie négative,Théologie négative,Théologie,Théologie 
STC 0 0 |a Contradicción,Filioque,Teología apofática,negativa,negativa,Teología,Teología 
STD 0 0 |a Contraddizione,Filioque,Teologia apofatica,Teologia negativa,Teologia negativa,Teologia,Teologia 
STE 0 0 |a 否定神学,反面神学,和子说,和子句,异议,矛盾,抗议,神学家 
STF 0 0 |a 否定神學,反面神學,和子說,和子句,異議,矛盾,抗議,神學家 
STG 0 0 |a Contradição,Filioque,Teologia apofática,negativa,negativa,Teologia,Teologia 
STH 0 0 |a Апофатическое богословие,Богословие (мотив),Богословие,Противоречие,Филиокве 
STI 0 0 |a Filioque,Εκπόρευση του Αγίου Πνεύματος,Αντίφαση,Αντιλογία,Αποφατική θεολογία,Αρνητική θεολογία,Θεολογία (μοτίβο),Θεολογία 
SYG 0 0 |a Collingwood, R. G.,1889-1943,K'ollingudŭ,1889-1943,Köllingudu,1889-1943,Kollingvud, R. Dzh.,1889-1943,Kollingvud, R. Dž.,1889-1943,Collingwood, Robin George,1889-1943,Collingwood, R.G.,1889-1943 , Christliche Theologie , Theologische Apophase