The Two Sins of Nob: Biblical Interpretation, an Anti-Priestly Polemic and a Geographical Error in Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum

According to LiberAntiquitatum Biblicarum (LAB) the priests of Nob were punished for their cultic sins. This unusual claim was influenced by the fact that there is no reference to Saul's sin and punishment in the book of Sam uel. Indeed, this incident remains without explanation in the rabbinic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Regev, Eyal (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2001
In: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Year: 2001, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, Pages: 85-104
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1777018099
003 DE-627
005 20221219175431.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211110s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/095182070101200104  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1777018099 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1777018099 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Regev, Eyal  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Two Sins of Nob: Biblical Interpretation, an Anti-Priestly Polemic and a Geographical Error in Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to LiberAntiquitatum Biblicarum (LAB) the priests of Nob were punished for their cultic sins. This unusual claim was influenced by the fact that there is no reference to Saul's sin and punishment in the book of Sam uel. Indeed, this incident remains without explanation in the rabbinic sources. By putting the blame on Nob's priests the author of LAB was influenced by the motif of the evil priests, a theme common in the Pseudepigrapha and the Qumran writings. Another diversion from the biblical text is the assertion in LAB that the case of 'the concubine in Gibeah' actually happened in Nob and not in Gibeah! The author mistakenly replaced Gibeah ('the hill') with the hill of Nob since the two locations are very close geographically. Conse quently, this article suggests that the interchange between Gibeah and Nob may indicate that the author of LAB saw Gibeah or Nob with his own eyes. 
601 |a Interpretation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha  |d London : Sage, 1987  |g 12(2001), 1, Seite 85-104  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341896721  |w (DE-600)2069413-1  |w (DE-576)119460610  |x 1745-5286  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2001  |g number:1  |g pages:85-104 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/095182070101200104  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4000927639 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1777018099 
LOK |0 005 20211110045852 
LOK |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-07-29#FACC88AF90542F9FA5F2EDC6B33985AB436DAF6E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB